| Recurring |
one_organization |
(a) The software failure incident related to Tinder exposing users' precise geolocation information due to a vulnerability in its application occurred within the same organization. The incident happened in 2013, and the flaw was fixed in early 2014 after being reported by Include Security [24691]. There is no specific mention of a similar incident happening again within Tinder or its parent company, IAC.
(b) There is no information in the provided article about a similar incident happening at other organizations or with their products and services. |
| Phase (Design/Operation) |
design, operation |
(a) The software failure incident in the article can be attributed to the design phase. The vulnerability associated with Tinder's geolocation feature was a flaw in the system's design that allowed a sophisticated user with programming skills to access precise latitude and longitude information of other users. This flaw was present in the system for most of 2013 until it was fixed in early 2014 [Article 24691].
(b) The software failure incident can also be linked to the operation phase. The misuse of the Tinder app by exploiting the vulnerability in the geolocation feature led to the creation of a private application called TinderFinder, which could pinpoint a person's location by inputting their Tinder identification number. This misuse highlighted the operational aspect of the failure, where users could exploit the system's design flaw for unauthorized access to sensitive information [Article 24691]. |
| Boundary (Internal/External) |
within_system |
(a) within_system: The software failure incident in the Tinder app was due to a vulnerability associated with its geolocation feature that allowed a user with programming skills and access to the app's API to obtain precise latitude and longitude information of another user. This vulnerability was within the system and was exploited by the security researchers to build their own application called TinderFinder, showcasing the flaw within the app itself [24691].
(b) outside_system: The software failure incident was not explicitly attributed to factors originating from outside the system in the provided article. |
| Nature (Human/Non-human) |
non-human_actions |
(a) The software failure incident in the Tinder app was due to non-human actions, specifically a vulnerability associated with its geolocation feature. The flaw allowed a sophisticated user with programming skills and access to the app's API to obtain precise latitude and longitude information of another user without their knowledge [Article 24691]. |
| Dimension (Hardware/Software) |
software |
(a) The software failure incident in the article was not attributed to hardware issues. It was primarily a software vulnerability related to Tinder's smartphone application and its geolocation feature [24691].
(b) The software failure incident was due to a vulnerability in Tinder's smartphone application related to its geolocation feature. The flaw allowed a user with programming skills and access to the app's API to obtain precise geolocation information of another user. This vulnerability was exploited by researchers to build an application called TinderFinder, showcasing the software flaw [24691]. |
| Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) |
malicious |
(a) The software failure incident in the article is classified as malicious. The vulnerability in Tinder's geolocation feature allowed a sophisticated user with programming skills to access precise latitude and longitude information of other users without their knowledge. This vulnerability could be exploited to locate users, demonstrating a clear intent to harm the system's security and privacy [24691]. |
| Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) |
poor_decisions |
(a) The intent of the software failure incident related to poor_decisions:
- The software failure incident involving Tinder's geolocation vulnerability was due to poor decisions made in the app's architecture and implementation.
- Tinder's architecture allowed for the transmission of very precise geolocation information behind the scenes, which could be exploited by users with programming skills and access to the app's API [Article 24691].
- The vulnerability was reported to Tinder in October 2013, indicating that the issue persisted for a significant period before being addressed in January 2014 [Article 24691]. |
| Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) |
development_incompetence |
(a) The software failure incident related to development incompetence is evident in the article as it mentions a vulnerability associated with Tinder's geolocation feature that existed for most of 2013. This vulnerability allowed a sophisticated user with programming skills and access to the app's API to obtain the exact latitude and longitude of another user. The fact that this vulnerability went unnoticed for a significant period before being fixed in early 2014 indicates a lack of professional competence in ensuring the security and privacy of user data [24691].
(b) The software failure incident related to accidental factors is highlighted in the article through the unintentional exposure of users' precise geolocation information by Tinder's app. The flaw in the app's architecture led to the transmission of this sensitive data behind the scenes, making it possible for users to be located without their knowledge. This accidental exposure of private information showcases how unintended consequences can arise from software vulnerabilities [24691]. |
| Duration |
temporary |
(a) The software failure incident in the article was temporary. The vulnerability associated with Tinder's geolocation feature existed for most of 2013 but was fixed earlier in the year 2014 [Article 24691]. This indicates that the failure was not permanent but rather temporary, as it was resolved by fixing the flaw in the software. |
| Behaviour |
value, other |
(a) crash: The software failure incident in the article does not involve a crash where the system loses state and does not perform any of its intended functions.
(b) omission: The software failure incident in the article does not involve omission where the system omits to perform its intended functions at an instance(s).
(c) timing: The software failure incident in the article does not involve timing issues where the system performs its intended functions correctly but too late or too early.
(d) value: The software failure incident in the article involves a failure related to the system performing its intended functions incorrectly. The vulnerability in Tinder's smartphone application allowed a user to obtain precise geolocation information of another user without their knowledge, which is an incorrect behavior [24691].
(e) byzantine: The software failure incident in the article does not involve a byzantine failure where the system behaves erroneously with inconsistent responses and interactions.
(f) other: The software failure incident in the article involves a privacy breach where the system exposed users' most private information without their knowledge, showcasing a failure in safeguarding user data [24691]. |