Incident: Meltdown and Spectre CPU Vulnerabilities Impacting Modern Computers

Published Date: 2018-01-03

Postmortem Analysis
Timeline 1. The software failure incident, involving the Meltdown and Spectre flaws, happened in June 2017 [Article 66925]. 2. The incident was discovered in the middle of 2017 but not made public until the first week of January 2018 [Article 67351].
System 1. Intel processors 2. ARM processors 3. AMD processors 4. Apple Mac systems and iOS devices 5. Microsoft Windows operating system 6. Linux operating system 7. Amazon Web Services 8. Google systems 9. Microsoft systems 10. Nearly all microprocessors 11. Virtually all Intel processors made in the last decade 12. Modern computer processing units designed by Intel and ARM 13. Various operating systems [Cited Articles: 66810, 66925, 66928, 67143, 67154, 67284, 67290, 67291, 67295, 67351, 67355, 67369, 67691]
Responsible Organization 1. Security researchers at Google’s Project Zero in conjunction with academic and industry researchers from several countries [66925, 66928, 67291] 2. Researchers from Graz University of Technology in Austria [66810, 66925, 66928] 3. Security experts [67154] 4. Intel [67284, 67369] 5. Various operating system developers [67143] 6. Companies like Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon, and the Linux Project [67143] 7. Hackers exploiting the vulnerabilities [67284] 8. Chip flaws named Spectre and Meltdown [67284, 67291, 67295, 67351, 67355, 67691] 9. Cloud computing services like Amazon, Google, and Microsoft [67154, 67351, 67691, 74797] 10. Data centers run by companies like Google, Amazon, and Microsoft [67355]
Impacted Organization 1. Amazon Web Services (AWS) [66810, 66925, 66928, 67284, 67351, 67691] 2. Google [66810, 66925, 66928, 67355, 67691] 3. Microsoft [66925, 66928, 67351, 67691] 4. Apple [66925, 66928, 67291, 67295, 67691] 5. Linux Project [67143, 67691]
Software Causes 1. The software causes of the failure incident were the security flaws named Meltdown and Spectre, which were discovered in computer chips affecting virtually every modern computer, including smartphones, tablets, and PCs from all vendors and running almost any operating system [66925, 66928, 66936, 67154, 67284, 67290, 67291, 67295, 67355, 67369, 67691].
Non-software Causes 1. The hardware bugs in the CPU chips that allowed programs to steal data [66810] 2. Security vulnerabilities in the computer chips affecting nearly all microprocessors [67154] 3. Flaws in computer chips that let hackers bypass the hardware barrier between applications and the computer's memory [67284] 4. Design issues impacting most modern chips, not specific to one vendor's product [67351]
Impacts 1. The Meltdown and Spectre flaws allowed programs to steal data being processed on computers, potentially compromising sensitive information like passwords, photos, and documents [66810, 67154, 67284]. 2. The disclosure of the flaws led to a significant impact on Intel's stock, causing a 3.4% drop [66925]. 3. Software patches to fix the Meltdown flaw could slow down computers by up to 30%, affecting performance, especially in cloud computing services [67154, 67284, 67691]. 4. The delay in updating customers about the risks associated with the flaws could affect Apple's business reputation and adoption by business customers [67284]. 5. The tech industry, including companies like Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon, and the Linux Project, collaborated to push out fixes for the vulnerabilities [67143]. 6. The flaws affected billions of PCs, smartphones, and tablets worldwide, prompting companies like Apple to release patches to mitigate the risks [67295]. 7. Cloud computing platforms, such as Amazon, Google, and Microsoft, had to implement fixes to address the vulnerabilities and limit the impact on their collective computing power [74797]. 8. The flaws were discovered by a team of researchers from various universities and security firms, highlighting the collaborative effort in identifying and addressing the software vulnerabilities [85159].
Preventions 1. Timely software and firmware updates provided by companies like Intel and ARM to mitigate the exploits could have prevented the software failure incident [66925]. 2. Keeping software up-to-date and installing patches on machines to fix vulnerabilities like Meltdown and Spectre could have prevented the software failure incident [67154]. 3. Enhanced collaboration and communication between industry players like Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon, and the Linux Project, along with researchers and processor makers, to push out fixes could have prevented the software failure incident [67143]. 4. Early detection and disclosure of vulnerabilities by security researchers and industry players could have prevented the software failure incident [67291]. 5. Implementing strict security measures such as advising customers to only download software from trusted sources and providing guidance on updating operating systems could have prevented the software failure incident [66928, 67284, 67295]. 6. Proactive testing and refinement of patches before deployment to ensure efficacy and prevent the creation of new bugs or instabilities could have prevented the software failure incident [67143]. 7. Increased awareness and vigilance among consumers and businesses to apply every software update received on their devices to reduce the risk of software failures could have prevented the incident [67154].
Fixes 1. Installing software patches on machines can fix the software failure incident related to the Meltdown and Spectre flaws [67284, 67291, 67295, 67296, 67297, 67355, 67369, 67691]. 2. Updating computers with the latest security fixes for Linux and Windows can help mitigate the security flaws [66925, 66928, 67143, 67154, 67290, 67291, 67295, 67296, 67297, 67355, 67369, 67691, 84945]. 3. Chromebooks updated to Chrome OS 63 and Android devices running the latest security update are already protected from the flaws [66925, 66928, 67291]. 4. Apple advised customers to update their devices' operating systems and download software only from trusted sources like the App Store to address the issue [66928]. 5. Companies like Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon, and the Linux Project have been collaborating with researchers and processor makers to push out fixes for the vulnerabilities [67143]. 6. The rush to push out patches and updates to fix the flaws is ongoing, with efforts from various tech firms and operating system providers [67297, 67355, 67369, 67691]. 7. Intel has begun providing software and firmware updates to mitigate the exploits related to the flaws [66925, 67154, 84945]. 8. The fixes for the software failure incident may involve a combination of software patches, firmware updates, and security fixes provided by different companies and operating system developers [67290, 67295, 67296, 67297, 67355, 67369, 67691, 84945].
References 1. Google [66925, 67284, 67291] 2. Apple [66928, 67284, 67295] 3. Intel [67284, 67297, 67369, 67691] 4. Microsoft [67143, 67691] 5. Linux Project [67143, 67691] 6. Amazon [67691] 7. ARM [67351] 8. AMD [67351] 9. TU Graz [66810, 67284, 85159] 10. University of Pennsylvania [66810] 11. University of Adelaide [66810, 85159] 12. Cyberus [66810, 66928, 67691, 85159] 13. Rambus [66810, 67691] 14. Graz University of Technology [66810, 66928, 67154, 67284, 67691, 85159] 15. Project Zero [66928, 67284, 67291] 16. Security researchers [67284, 67291, 67351, 67691, 85159] 17. The Register [67284, 67351, 67691] 18. United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team [67143] 19. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [85159] 20. University of Michigan [85159] 21. KU Leuven [85159] 22. Worcester Polytechnic Institute [85159] 23. Saarland University [85159]

Software Taxonomy of Faults

Category Option Rationale
Recurring one_organization, multiple_organization (a) The software failure incident related to Meltdown and Spectre has happened again at Intel. The incident involved a recent, critical vulnerability in Intel's Management Engine, which was finally fixed after seven years [Article 67143]. Additionally, the incident affected Intel chips, and the company confirmed that the flaws reported by researchers could allow hackers to steal sensitive information from computers, phones, and other devices [Article 67369]. (b) The software failure incident related to Meltdown and Spectre has also affected other organizations such as Amazon, Google, and Microsoft. These companies, along with Intel, were impacted by the Meltdown and Spectre vulnerabilities, leading to the need for patches and updates to protect against the flaws [Article 66810, Article 66928, Article 67351, Article 67355, Article 67691, Article 74797].
Phase (Design/Operation) design, operation (a) The software failure incident related to the design phase: - The software failure incident related to the Meltdown and Spectre flaws was due to a design flaw in computer processors that allowed hackers to steal sensitive data without users knowing. This flaw bypassed the hardware barrier between applications run by users and the computer's core memory, which is normally highly protected [66928]. - The flaws, named Meltdown and Spectre, were discovered by security researchers at Google’s Project Zero in conjunction with academic and industry researchers. Meltdown, in particular, allowed hackers to bypass the hardware barrier between applications run by users and the computer's memory, potentially letting hackers read a computer's memory. This flaw affected chips made as far back as 1995 [66925]. (b) The software failure incident related to the operation phase: - The operation phase failure was due to the vulnerabilities impacting fundamental aspects of how systems operate, making the efficacy of early updates somewhat suspect. There were concerns that slapdash fixes may not offer total protection or could create other bugs and instabilities that would need to be resolved [67143]. - The vulnerabilities, Meltdown and Spectre, opened a new avenue of attack on PCs, phones, and servers. If an attacker managed to place malicious software on a device, they could use Meltdown or Spectre to listen in on other software whose data is supposed to be secure, potentially accessing passwords and encryption keys [67355].
Boundary (Internal/External) within_system (a) within_system: - The software failure incident related to Meltdown and Spectre was primarily within the system, as it was caused by serious security flaws found within computer processors [66928]. - Meltdown and Spectre allowed hackers to bypass the hardware barrier between applications and the computer's memory, potentially letting them read sensitive data [67284]. - Meltdown specifically affected Intel chips, allowing hackers to access the computer's memory [67284]. - The flaws were discovered by security researchers and academic and industry researchers, indicating an internal system vulnerability [66925, 67291]. (b) outside_system: - The software failure incident was not primarily due to factors originating from outside the system, as the flaws were inherent within the computer processors themselves [66928, 67284]. - The vulnerabilities impacted fundamental aspects of the processors, indicating an internal system issue [67143]. - Various operating system developers were working on fixes for the flaws, suggesting a response to an internal system issue [67143].
Nature (Human/Non-human) non-human_actions, human_actions (a) The software failure incident occurring due to non-human actions: - The software failure incident related to the Meltdown and Spectre flaws was caused by hardware bugs that allowed programs to steal data being processed on the computer [66810]. - Meltdown and Spectre were serious security flaws found within computer processors that could allow hackers to steal sensitive data without users knowing, affecting virtually every modern computer [66928]. - Meltdown is a security flaw that could allow hackers to bypass the hardware barrier between applications run by users and the computer’s core memory, which is normally highly protected [66928]. - Meltdown lets hackers bypass the hardware barrier between applications run by users and the computer's memory, potentially letting hackers read a computer's memory [67284]. - The Meltdown and Spectre flaws were discovered by security researchers and affect billions of PCs, smartphones, and tablets around the world [67295]. - The attacks bypass security mechanisms in Intel's speculative execution systems to siphon off sensitive data being transmitted in the chip, such as passwords, keys, account tokens, or private messages [85159]. (b) The software failure incident occurring due to human actions: - The researchers who discovered the Meltdown and Spectre flaws notified various affected companies and tried to keep the news from the public so hackers could not take advantage of the flaws before they were fixed [67691].
Dimension (Hardware/Software) hardware, software (a) The software failure incident occurring due to hardware: - The software failure incident related to the Meltdown and Spectre flaws was primarily caused by hardware vulnerabilities in computer processors [66810, 66925, 66928, 66936, 67143, 67154, 67284, 67290, 67295, 67296, 67351, 67355, 67369, 67691, 85159]. (b) The software failure incident occurring due to software: - The software failure incident related to the Meltdown and Spectre flaws was exacerbated by software patches needed to fix the issue, which could slow down computers by as much as 30 percent [67691].
Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) malicious, non-malicious (a) The software failure incident related to the Meltdown and Spectre flaws can be categorized as malicious. These flaws were discovered to be vulnerabilities that could allow hackers to steal sensitive data without users knowing, affecting virtually every modern computer, including smartphones, tablets, and PCs from all vendors and running almost any operating system [66925]. The flaws, named Meltdown and Spectre, could allow hackers to steal data from nearly every computing device containing chips from Intel, AMD, and Arm [67284]. Hackers could exploit these flaws to lift passwords, photos, documents, and other data from various devices, including PCs, phones, and servers [67154]. The attacks bypass security mechanisms in Intel's speculative execution systems to siphon off sensitive data being transmitted in the chip, such as passwords, keys, account tokens, or private messages [85159]. (b) The software failure incident can also be considered non-malicious as it was a result of flaws found within computer processors, specifically Meltdown and Spectre, which could allow hackers to steal sensitive data without users knowing [66928]. The exact severity of the flaw was viewed as serious by various operating system developers, who were taking significant measures to fix the issue, indicating that it was a serious problem that apparently could not be patched with a small update [67290]. The researchers who discovered the Meltdown and Spectre flaws reported that there was no evidence that either vulnerability had been exploited yet, emphasizing the importance of downloading software only from trusted sources to avoid "malicious" apps [67295].
Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) unknown (a) poor_decisions: - The software failure incident related to the Meltdown and Spectre flaws was not due to poor decisions but rather due to inherent design flaws in computer processors that allowed hackers to steal sensitive data [66810, 66925, 66928, 66936, 67284, 67291, 67351, 67355, 67691, 74797, 85159]. (b) accidental_decisions: - The software failure incident related to the Meltdown and Spectre flaws was not due to accidental decisions but rather due to inherent design flaws in computer processors that allowed hackers to steal sensitive data [66810, 66925, 66928, 66936, 67284, 67291, 67351, 67355, 67691, 74797, 85159].
Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) accidental (a) The software failure incident related to development incompetence is evident in the articles discussing the Meltdown and Spectre flaws. The flaws were discovered by security researchers at Google's Project Zero, academic researchers, and industry researchers [66925, 66928, 67291]. The severity of the flaws was significant, with Meltdown being described as "probably one of the worst CPU bugs ever found" [66925]. The flaws affected virtually every modern computer, including smartphones, tablets, and PCs from all vendors and running almost any operating system [66925]. The flaws allowed hackers to bypass hardware barriers and potentially access sensitive data, such as passwords and encryption keys [67284, 67355]. The lengths taken by operating system developers to fix the flaws indicated the seriousness of the problem [67290]. The tech industry had known about the issue for at least six months before it was publicly disclosed, and efforts were made to keep it under wraps until fixes were developed [67297]. The flaws were not unique to one chipmaker or device but impacted a wide range of devices [67351]. (b) The software failure incident related to accidental factors is evident in the articles discussing the Meltdown and Spectre flaws. The flaws were discovered by security researchers accidentally during their analysis [66925, 66928, 67291]. The flaws were not intentionally introduced but were inherent in the design of modern computer chips, affecting a wide range of devices [67351]. The flaws allowed hackers to exploit vulnerabilities in the chips' design, potentially leading to the theft of sensitive information [67355]. The discovery of the flaws led to a scramble behind the scenes to create fixes and prevent malicious use [67291]. The severity of the flaws and the challenges in fixing them indicated that they were not introduced intentionally but were accidental consequences of chip design [67290].
Duration permanent, temporary (a) The software failure incident related to the Meltdown and Spectre flaws can be considered as a permanent failure. These flaws were discovered in computer processors and were described as serious security vulnerabilities that could allow hackers to steal sensitive data without users knowing [66928]. Meltdown, in particular, was highlighted as one of the worst CPU bugs ever found, with the potential for any application to steal data, including simple tasks like viewing a web page in a browser [66928]. The impact of these flaws was significant, leading to the need for immediate attention and the deployment of software patches to mitigate the risks [66928]. The severity of the issue was such that it was suggested that a full replacement of the affected chips would be the only solution to the threats posed by Meltdown and Spectre, although this was not deemed feasible given the widespread nature of the problem [67154]. (b) The software failure incident can also be considered as temporary to some extent. While the flaws were serious and required immediate attention, software patches were developed and released by various companies to address the vulnerabilities [67154]. For example, Microsoft released a patch for PCs using Windows, Apple released patches for iOS, Macs, and Apple TV, and Intel was working on updates to fix the problem [67154]. However, it was noted that patching systems could slow down machines by as much as 30% in certain situations, which could be a concern for big cloud systems and other users accustomed to fast performance [67691].
Behaviour crash, omission, timing, value, other (a) crash: - The articles discuss the Meltdown and Spectre flaws that could lead to a crash or failure of the system due to the potential for hackers to steal sensitive data without users knowing [66928]. - The software patches needed to fix the Meltdown issue could slow down computers by as much as 30 percent, impacting performance [67691]. (b) omission: - The Meltdown and Spectre flaws could allow hackers to bypass the hardware barrier between applications and the computer's core memory, potentially leading to the omission of performing intended functions securely [66810]. - The flaws could allow hackers to steal sensitive data without users knowing, indicating an omission in protecting user data [66928]. (c) timing: - The Meltdown and Spectre flaws could result in the system performing its intended functions correctly but at the wrong time, allowing hackers to steal data while it is being processed on the computer [66810]. (d) value: - The Meltdown and Spectre flaws could lead to the system performing its intended functions incorrectly by allowing hackers to steal sensitive data from the computer's memory [67284]. (e) byzantine: - The articles do not specifically mention the software failure incident exhibiting a byzantine behavior. (f) other: - The Meltdown and Spectre flaws could result in the system behaving in a way not described in the other options, such as allowing hackers to spy deeply into other processes and data on the target computer or smartphone [66810].

IoT System Layer

Layer Option Rationale
Perception None None
Communication None None
Application None None

Other Details

Category Option Rationale
Consequence property, non-human, theoretical_consequence, other (a) death: There is no mention of any deaths resulting from the software failure incident in the provided articles. (b) harm: There is no mention of physical harm to individuals resulting from the software failure incident in the provided articles. (c) basic: There is no mention of people's access to food or shelter being impacted due to the software failure incident in the provided articles. (d) property: The software failure incident impacted people's material goods, money, or data. The vulnerabilities could allow hackers to steal sensitive data without users knowing, potentially leading to data breaches and financial losses [Article 66928]. (e) delay: There is no mention of people having to postpone an activity due to the software failure incident in the provided articles. (f) non-human: Non-human entities were impacted due to the software failure incident. The vulnerabilities affected billions of PCs, smartphones, and tablets worldwide, including products from Apple, leading to the release of patches to mitigate the flaws [Article 67295]. (g) no_consequence: There were observed consequences of the software failure incident, particularly related to data security vulnerabilities and the need for software patches. (h) theoretical_consequence: There were potential consequences discussed regarding the software failure incident. The vulnerabilities revealed fundamental flaws in computer chip design, leading to a need for a serious rethink in how such technology is made in the future [Article 67297]. (i) other: The software patch needed to fix the Meltdown vulnerability could slow down computers by as much as 30 percent, impacting performance for users accustomed to fast downloads [Article 67691].
Domain information, manufacturing, finance, government (a) The software failure incident impacted the production and distribution of information as it involved major security vulnerabilities named "Meltdown" and "Spectre" discovered in CPU chips that power most computers in the world, potentially exposing sensitive data like banking records, passwords, and secret information [Article 66928, Article 66936]. (b) The transportation industry was not directly mentioned in the articles provided. (c) The software failure incident did not directly relate to the extraction of materials from Earth. (d) The incident did not specifically involve the sales industry. (e) The construction industry was not directly linked to the software failure incident. (f) The manufacturing industry was indirectly affected as the vulnerabilities impacted the functioning of software running on computer chips, potentially allowing data to be accessed by unauthorized parties [Article 67154]. (g) The utilities industry, which provides power, gas, steam, water, and sewage services, was not directly mentioned in the context of the software failure incident. (h) The finance industry was significantly impacted by the software failure incident as financial services firms were studying the vulnerabilities to determine the best response, considering the potential security threat and performance degradation [Article 67369]. (i) The incident did not directly relate to the knowledge industry encompassing education, research, and space exploration. (j) The health industry was not directly mentioned in the articles provided. (k) The entertainment industry was not directly linked to the software failure incident. (l) The government sector was indirectly affected as the incident involved collaboration between processor manufacturers, hardware companies, and software companies to address the vulnerabilities, with implications for critical infrastructure settings [Article 67143]. (m) The software failure incident was not explicitly associated with any other industry mentioned in the options.

Sources

Back to List