Incident: PGP and S/MIME Vulnerable to eFail Attack Impacting Encrypted Emails

Published Date: 2018-05-14

Postmortem Analysis
Timeline 1. The software failure incident involving the vulnerabilities in PGP and S/MIME, known as eFail, happened in May 2018 as reported in Article 71108 and Article 71263.
System 1. PGP (Pretty Good Privacy) encryption scheme [71108, 71263] 2. S/MIME standard [71108]
Responsible Organization 1. Hackers were responsible for causing the software failure incident related to the vulnerabilities in PGP and S/MIME encryption schemes [71108]. 2. The vulnerability in PGP emails was caused by email programs that failed to check for decryption errors properly before following links in emails that included HTML code [71263].
Impacted Organization 1. Users who rely on encrypted email to protect their privacy, security, and safety [71108] 2. Email clients using PGP and S/MIME encryption schemes [71108] 3. Providers of software that can encrypt data using PGP [71263]
Software Causes 1. The software causes of the failure incident were vulnerabilities in the email encryption schemes PGP and S/MIME, specifically related to how email clients processed HTML elements in encrypted messages [71108, 71263].
Non-software Causes 1. Lack of proper safeguards in email programs that failed to check for decryption errors before following links in emails that included HTML code [71263]. 2. Overblown reaction by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) which advised immediately disabling email tools that automatically decrypted PGP [71263].
Impacts 1. The vulnerability in PGP and S/MIME encryption schemes, known as eFail, allowed hackers to expose plaintext versions of encrypted messages, compromising the privacy and security of users who relied on encrypted email [71108]. 2. The weakness in PGP encryption led to the recommendation to disable PGP/GPG or S/MIME for sensitive communication until reliable fixes were available, impacting users who depended on these encryption methods for secure communication [71108]. 3. The vulnerability in PGP encryption raised concerns among cybersecurity researchers about the potential for decrypting a cache of encrypted emails sent in the past, posing a risk to the confidentiality of sensitive information and business secrets [71263]. 4. The incident highlighted the importance of properly checking for decryption errors in email programs to prevent vulnerabilities, emphasizing the need for appropriate safeguards in software design to protect against attacks [71263]. 5. Users of PGP email were advised to disable HTML in their mail programs as a precautionary measure to mitigate the risks associated with the vulnerability, impacting how users interacted with encrypted emails to enhance security [71263].
Preventions 1. Implementing proper decryption error checking in email programs to prevent following links in emails that include HTML code [71263]. 2. Enhancing the core architecture of PGP encryption to address known vulnerabilities and ensure secure communication [71108]. 3. Increasing awareness and cooperation within the secure email community to address issues promptly and effectively [71108].
Fixes 1. Implement reliable fixes for the vulnerability in PGP and S/MIME encryption schemes [71108]. 2. Disable PGP/GPG or S/MIME in email clients for sensitive communication until patches or other mitigations are available [71108]. 3. Patch encrypted email plugins whenever updates are released and disable remote image and custom HTML execution as much as possible [71108]. 4. Enhance email clients to properly check for decryption errors before following links in emails with HTML code [71263]. 5. Users can disable HTML in their mail programs to protect themselves from attacks based on the vulnerability [71263].
References 1. German and Belgian researchers who posted their findings [Article 71108] 2. Sebastian Schinzel, IT security lab at the Münster University of Applied Sciences [Article 71108] 3. Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) [Article 71108] 4. Werner Koch, developer behind GNUPrivacyGuard [Article 71108] 5. Robert Hansen, colleague of Werner Koch [Article 71263] 6. Mikko Hypponen, security expert at F-Secure [Article 71263] 7. Alan Woodward, University of Surrey [Article 71263]

Software Taxonomy of Faults

Category Option Rationale
Recurring one_organization, multiple_organization (a) The software failure incident related to the vulnerability in PGP and S/MIME encryption schemes has happened again at the same organization or with its products and services. The incident was specifically related to a serious vulnerability in PGP encryption, as reported by researchers from Munster University of Applied Sciences [71108, 71263]. (b) The software failure incident has also happened at multiple organizations or with their products and services. The vulnerability in PGP encryption was a widespread issue affecting various email clients that use PGP for encryption, as highlighted by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and other security experts [71108, 71263].
Phase (Design/Operation) design, operation (a) The software failure incident related to the design phase is evident in the articles. The vulnerability in PGP and S/MIME encryption schemes, known as eFail, was due to weaknesses in how email clients processed HTML elements in encrypted messages. Attackers could manipulate the HTML elements to expose plaintext versions of encrypted messages, highlighting a flaw in the design of the encryption systems [71108, 71263]. (b) The software failure incident related to the operation phase is also apparent. The vulnerability in PGP emails was exploited by attackers through email programs that failed to check for decryption errors properly before following links in emails containing HTML code. This operational flaw allowed for the attack on PGP emails to occur, emphasizing issues with the operation or misuse of the system [71263].
Boundary (Internal/External) within_system, outside_system (a) within_system: The software failure incident related to the PGP and S/MIME encryption schemes vulnerability, known as eFail, is primarily within the system. The vulnerability arises from how the email clients decrypt encrypted messages and process HTML elements, allowing attackers to manipulate the message content and extract plaintext. The weakness is inherent to the design and implementation of the encryption schemes and how email clients handle decryption and rendering of messages [71108, 71263]. (b) outside_system: The software failure incident also involves factors originating from outside the system. For example, the attack requires the attacker to intercept encrypted messages before manipulating them, indicating an external interception of communication channels. Additionally, the vulnerability could potentially allow attackers to decrypt a cache of encrypted emails sent in the past if they have access to such data, suggesting a threat from external sources [71263].
Nature (Human/Non-human) non-human_actions, human_actions (a) The software failure incident in the articles is primarily due to non-human actions. The vulnerability in the PGP and S/MIME encryption schemes, known as eFail, allows attackers to manipulate how encrypted emails process HTML elements, leading to the exposure of plaintext versions of messages [71108]. The vulnerability was found in the core protocol of PGP, affecting email programs that failed to check for decryption errors properly before following links in emails containing HTML code [71263]. (b) However, human actions also played a role in the failure. The issue was initially overblown by the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), which advised immediately disabling email tools that automatically decrypted PGP, causing concern among cybersecurity researchers [71263]. Additionally, the vulnerability could be used by attackers to decrypt a cache of encrypted emails sent in the past if they had access to such data, highlighting the potential risks associated with human actions in managing encrypted communications [71263].
Dimension (Hardware/Software) hardware, software (a) The software failure incident occurring due to hardware: - The vulnerability in PGP and S/MIME encryption schemes, known as eFail, was due to an attacker manipulating how the message processes its HTML elements, like images and multimedia styling, which could expose plaintext versions of encrypted messages [71108]. - The vulnerability in PGP emails specifically concerned email programs that failed to check for decryption errors properly before following links in emails that included HTML code, indicating a flaw in the email programs' hardware-related processes [71263]. (b) The software failure incident occurring due to software: - The weakness in PGP and S/MIME encryption schemes, leading to the eFail attack, was a software-related vulnerability that allowed attackers to grab plaintext of encrypted messages by manipulating HTML elements in the message [71108]. - The vulnerability in PGP emails was not a flaw in the OpenPGP system itself but rather in email programs that had been designed without appropriate safeguards, indicating a software-related issue [71263].
Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) malicious, non-malicious (a) The software failure incident related to the PGP and S/MIME encryption schemes vulnerability, known as eFail, can be categorized as malicious. The vulnerability allowed attackers to manipulate encrypted emails to expose plaintext versions of the messages, posing a significant threat to users' privacy and security [71108]. (b) On the other hand, the vulnerability in PGP emails, as reported by researchers, was not considered a vulnerability in the OpenPGP system itself but rather in email programs that lacked appropriate safeguards. This indicates a non-malicious software failure incident where the issue was due to the design flaws in the email programs rather than intentional harm [71263].
Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) poor_decisions (a) The intent of the software failure incident: - The software failure incident related to the PGP and S/MIME encryption schemes vulnerability, known as eFail, was not due to accidental decisions but rather poor decisions. The vulnerability emerged when an attacker manipulated how the message processed its HTML elements, allowing them to grab the plaintext of the message [71108]. - The issue with PGP emails was specifically related to email programs that failed to check for decryption errors properly before following links in emails that included HTML code, indicating a poor decision in the design of these email programs [71263].
Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) development_incompetence, accidental (a) The software failure incident related to the PGP and S/MIME encryption schemes vulnerability, known as eFail, can be attributed to development incompetence. The weakness in the encryption schemes allowed a hacker to expose plaintext versions of encrypted messages by manipulating how the message processes its HTML elements [71108]. Additionally, the vulnerability in PGP emails was found to be a serious flaw, with concerns that the issue affected the core protocol of PGP, potentially making all uses of the encryption method vulnerable [71263]. (b) The software failure incident can also be considered accidental as the vulnerability in PGP emails was not initially recognized as a vulnerability in the OpenPGP system itself but rather in email programs that had been designed without appropriate safeguards [71263]. This indicates that the vulnerability was not intentionally introduced but rather a result of oversight or lack of proper implementation practices.
Duration temporary The software failure incident related to the PGP and S/MIME encryption schemes vulnerability, known as eFail, can be considered a temporary failure. This is because the vulnerability arises from specific circumstances where an attacker manipulates how encrypted emails process HTML elements, allowing them to grab plaintext messages. The incident is not a permanent failure as it is not a fundamental flaw in the encryption schemes themselves but rather a vulnerability in email programs that fail to check for decryption errors properly before following links in emails with HTML code [71108, 71263].
Behaviour omission, value, other (a) crash: The software failure incident described in the articles does not involve a crash where the system loses state and does not perform any of its intended functions. (b) omission: The vulnerability in PGP and S/MIME email encryption schemes allowed attackers to manipulate encrypted emails, leading to the exposure of plaintext versions of messages. This can be considered a failure due to the system omitting to perform its intended function of securely encrypting and protecting email content [71108, 71263]. (c) timing: The incident does not involve a failure related to the system performing its intended functions too late or too early. (d) value: The vulnerability in the PGP and S/MIME encryption schemes resulted in the system performing its intended function of encryption incorrectly, leading to the exposure of plaintext messages. This can be categorized as a failure due to the system performing its intended functions incorrectly [71108, 71263]. (e) byzantine: The software failure incident does not exhibit behavior of the system behaving erroneously with inconsistent responses and interactions. (f) other: The other behavior observed in this software failure incident is the system failing to properly check for decryption errors and following links in emails that included HTML code, which ultimately led to the vulnerability being exploited. This can be considered a failure due to the system behaving in a way that lacks appropriate safeguards [71263].

IoT System Layer

Layer Option Rationale
Perception None None
Communication None None
Application None None

Other Details

Category Option Rationale
Consequence theoretical_consequence (a) death: People lost their lives due to the software failure (b) harm: People were physically harmed due to the software failure (c) basic: People's access to food or shelter was impacted because of the software failure (d) property: People's material goods, money, or data was impacted due to the software failure (e) delay: People had to postpone an activity due to the software failure (f) non-human: Non-human entities were impacted due to the software failure (g) no_consequence: There were no real observed consequences of the software failure (h) theoretical_consequence: There were potential consequences discussed of the software failure that did not occur (i) other: Was there consequence(s) of the software failure not described in the (a to h) options? What is the other consequence(s)? The articles do not mention any direct consequences such as death, physical harm, impact on basic needs, property loss, or non-human entities being affected due to the software failure incident related to the vulnerabilities in PGP and S/MIME encryption schemes [71108, 71263]. The main consequences discussed revolve around the potential risks to data security and privacy, the need to disable certain features in email clients, and the implications for users who rely on encrypted communication for sensitive information.
Domain information, finance (a) The software failure incident reported in the articles is related to the industry of information. The incident involves vulnerabilities in email encryption schemes like PGP and S/MIME, which are commonly used for secure communication of information [71108, 71263]. (h) The incident also has implications for the finance industry as encrypted email communication is crucial for secure exchange of financial information and transactions [71108, 71263]. (m) The software failure incident is not directly related to any other industry mentioned in the options provided.

Sources

Back to List