Recurring |
one_organization |
(a) The software failure incident related to the exploding body camera happened within the same organization, the New York Police Department (NYPD). The incident involved the Vievu LE-5 camera, which is a product used by NYPD officers. The department had to remove thousands of officers' body cameras due to the incident, and the cause of the defect is being investigated [77366].
(b) There is no information in the provided article about a similar incident happening at other organizations or with their products and services. |
Phase (Design/Operation) |
design |
(a) The software failure incident in this case seems to be related to the design phase. The incident occurred due to a potential issue with the camera's battery, which is a component of the design of the body camera system. The New York Police Department removed the officers' body cameras after one camera exploded, indicating a design flaw that could have been introduced during the system development or manufacturing process [77366].
(b) There is no specific information in the provided article indicating that the software failure incident was due to factors introduced by the operation or misuse of the system. |
Boundary (Internal/External) |
within_system |
(a) within_system: The software failure incident of the NYPD officers' body cameras can be categorized as within_system. The article mentions that the issue was related to the camera's battery, which is an internal component of the body camera system. The department pointed to the camera's battery as a possible source of the problem, indicating that the failure originated from within the system itself [77366]. |
Nature (Human/Non-human) |
non-human_actions |
(a) The software failure incident in this case was not directly attributed to non-human actions but rather to a hardware issue. The article mentions that the New York Police Department removed officers' body cameras after one camera exploded, with the department pointing to the camera's battery as a possible source of the problem. The cause and scope of the defect are being investigated, indicating a hardware-related issue rather than a non-human action [77366].
(b) The failure in this incident was not due to human actions but rather a hardware-related issue. The article states that the Staten Island officer's body camera started to smoke and then exploded on the ground, leading to the removal of all LE-5 cameras used by officers. The focus of the investigation seems to be on the camera's battery as a potential source of the problem, suggesting a hardware failure rather than a failure caused by human actions [77366]. |
Dimension (Hardware/Software) |
hardware |
(a) The software failure incident in this case was related to hardware. The article mentions that a New York Police Department officer's body camera, specifically the Vievu LE-5 camera, started to smoke and then exploded while the officer was on duty. The department pointed to the camera's battery as a possible source of the problem, indicating that the failure originated in the hardware component of the camera [77366].
(b) The software failure incident was not specifically attributed to software issues in the articles provided. The focus was on the camera's battery as a possible source of the problem, and there was no mention of software contributing to the failure [77366]. |
Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) |
non-malicious |
(a) The software failure incident described in the article does not indicate any malicious intent. The failure was related to a physical issue with the body camera's battery, leading to an explosion, which resulted in the removal of thousands of officers' body cameras for safety reasons. The incident was attributed to a defect in the camera's battery, and the manufacturer, Axon, stated that officer safety is of utmost importance to them and they are working closely with the NYPD to investigate the issue [77366].
(b) The software failure incident can be categorized as non-malicious, as there is no indication in the article that the failure was caused by any intentional actions to harm the system. |
Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) |
unknown |
The software failure incident involving the explosion of a New York Police Department officer's body camera does not directly point to a software-related issue. The incident was attributed to the camera's battery as a possible source of the problem, leading to the removal of all LE-5 cameras and an investigation into the cause and scope of the defect [77366]. Therefore, the intent of the software failure incident in this case is unknown as it does not clearly fall under either poor_decisions or accidental_decisions. |
Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) |
accidental |
(a) The software failure incident in this case does not seem to be related to development incompetence. The incident was specifically related to a physical issue with the body camera's battery, which caused it to smoke and explode. The article mentions that the cause and scope of the defect are being investigated, indicating that it was a hardware issue rather than a software development problem [77366].
(b) The software failure incident appears to be accidental in nature. The article describes how the body camera used by a police officer started to smoke and then exploded while the officer was on duty. The incident was not intentional and no one was injured in the process. The manufacturer, Axon, stated that they are working closely with the NYPD to investigate the issue and ensure officer safety, indicating that the failure was accidental rather than intentional [77366]. |
Duration |
temporary |
The software failure incident reported in Article 77366 is related to the malfunction of the Vievu LE-5 body cameras used by the New York Police Department. The incident was temporary in nature as the failure was specific to the LE-5 model cameras, leading to the removal of these cameras from service while officers using the LE-4 model continued to use them [77366]. The department mentioned that the cause and scope of the defect are being investigated, indicating that the failure was not permanent but rather a specific issue with the LE-5 cameras. |
Behaviour |
other |
(a) crash: The software failure incident described in the article is not a crash where the system loses state and does not perform any of its intended functions. The incident involved the explosion of a police officer's body camera, which was attributed to a possible issue with the camera's battery [77366].
(b) omission: The software failure incident is not an omission where the system omits to perform its intended functions at an instance(s). The incident did not involve the camera failing to perform its functions but rather malfunctioning and exploding [77366].
(c) timing: The software failure incident is not a timing issue where the system performs its intended functions correctly but too late or too early. The incident did not involve a timing-related failure but rather a sudden malfunction leading to an explosion [77366].
(d) value: The software failure incident is not a value issue where the system performs its intended functions incorrectly. The incident did not involve the camera providing incorrect data or output but rather a physical malfunction leading to an explosion [77366].
(e) byzantine: The software failure incident is not a byzantine failure where the system behaves erroneously with inconsistent responses and interactions. The incident did not involve erratic or inconsistent behavior but rather a sudden malfunction leading to an explosion [77366].
(f) other: The software failure incident can be categorized as a physical failure rather than a software failure. The incident involved a Vievu LE-5 body camera exploding, which was attributed to a possible issue with the camera's battery. This physical malfunction led to the removal of thousands of officers' body cameras by the NYPD [77366]. |