Recurring |
multiple_organization |
(a) The software failure incident having happened again at one_organization:
The article does not provide specific information about a similar incident happening again within the same organization or with its products and services. Therefore, it is unknown if a similar incident has occurred again at the same organization.
(b) The software failure incident having happened again at multiple_organization:
The article discusses the findings of researchers at Ca' Foscari University of Venice and Tu Wien in Austria regarding TLS vulnerabilities in the web's top 10,000 HTTPS sites. These vulnerabilities were found in various websites, indicating that similar incidents related to TLS vulnerabilities have occurred at multiple organizations [82202]. |
Phase (Design/Operation) |
unknown |
The articles do not provide specific information about a software failure incident occurring due to the development phases related to design or operation. |
Boundary (Internal/External) |
within_system, outside_system |
The software failure incident discussed in the articles can be categorized as both within_system and outside_system:
(a) within_system: The failure is within the system as it involves vulnerabilities in how sites implemented TLS encryption schemes and failures to patch known bugs in TLS and its predecessor, Secure Sockets Layer [82202].
(b) outside_system: The failure is also influenced by factors outside the system, such as the interconnectedness of the web and dependencies between URLs and hosts that can amplify TLS vulnerabilities across different sites [82202]. |
Nature (Human/Non-human) |
non-human_actions, human_actions |
(a) The software failure incident occurring due to non-human actions:
The article discusses how researchers found potentially exploitable TLS vulnerabilities in a surprising number of encrypted sites. These flaws were caused by a combination of issues in how sites implemented TLS encryption schemes and failures to patch known bugs in TLS and its predecessor, Secure Sockets Layer. The vulnerabilities were subtle enough that the green padlock indicating secure connection would still appear, but they could potentially allow attackers to decrypt traffic passing through flawed encryption channels. These vulnerabilities were categorized as "partially leaky," "leaky," and "tainted," with the most severe being the "tainted" vulnerabilities that could not only decrypt traffic but also modify or manipulate it [82202].
(b) The software failure incident occurring due to human actions:
The article mentions that many of the TLS vulnerabilities found were not necessarily critical vulnerabilities and might not be appealing targets for hackers because they would take more effort and be more conspicuous to abuse in an attack than other common vulnerabilities. The article emphasizes the importance of web developers employing modern HTTP antitampering techniques to address these vulnerabilities. It also highlights the struggle of a surprisingly large number of high-traffic sites in handling cookies on web servers and using decent TLS, indicating potential shortcomings in human actions related to web development and security practices [82202]. |
Dimension (Hardware/Software) |
unknown |
The articles do not provide information about a software failure incident related to hardware or software failures. |
Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) |
non-malicious |
(a) The software failure incident discussed in the articles is non-malicious. The failure is related to TLS vulnerabilities in websites, which were caused by issues in how sites implemented encryption schemes and failures to patch known bugs in TLS and its predecessor, Secure Sockets Layer [82202]. The vulnerabilities were not necessarily critical vulnerabilities and might not be appealing targets for hackers due to the effort and conspicuousness required to exploit them [82202].
(b) The software failure incident is non-malicious as it was not caused by any malicious intent but rather by unintentional flaws in the implementation of TLS encryption on websites [82202]. |
Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) |
poor_decisions |
The software failure incident discussed in the articles is related to poor_decisions. The failure was due to a combination of issues in how sites implemented TLS encryption schemes and failures to patch known bugs in TLS and its predecessor, Secure Sockets Layer [82202]. The vulnerabilities found in the TLS encryption channels between browsers and web servers could potentially allow attackers to decrypt traffic, modify it, or conduct "man in the middle" attacks, which are precisely what HTTPS encryption aims to prevent. The flaws were subtle enough that the green padlock indicating secure connection would still appear, highlighting the severity of the vulnerabilities introduced by these poor decisions in implementing and maintaining secure encryption protocols. |
Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) |
development_incompetence |
(a) The article discusses software failure incidents related to development incompetence, specifically in the context of TLS vulnerabilities in HTTPS sites. Researchers found that a surprising number of encrypted sites had potentially exploitable TLS vulnerabilities due to issues in how sites implemented TLS encryption schemes and failures to patch known bugs in TLS and its predecessor, Secure Sockets Layer [82202].
(b) The article does not provide information on software failure incidents occurring due to accidental factors. |
Duration |
unknown |
The articles do not provide information about the duration of the software failure incident being permanent or temporary. |
Behaviour |
value, other |
(a) crash: The articles do not mention any software failure incident related to a crash.
(b) omission: The articles do not mention any software failure incident related to omission.
(c) timing: The articles do not mention any software failure incident related to timing.
(d) value: The software failure incident discussed in the articles is related to the system performing its intended functions incorrectly. Specifically, the vulnerabilities in TLS encryption schemes and failures to patch known bugs led to flaws that could potentially allow attackers to decrypt, modify, or manipulate traffic passing through the affected sites [82202].
(e) byzantine: The articles do not mention any software failure incident related to a byzantine behavior.
(f) other: The software failure incident described in the articles involves subtle TLS vulnerabilities that could potentially allow attackers to decrypt, modify, or manipulate traffic passing through affected sites. These vulnerabilities are not necessarily critical but could still be exploited, although they might not be appealing targets for hackers due to the effort and visibility required for abuse [82202]. |