Recurring |
unknown |
(a) The article does not mention any previous incidents of a similar nature happening again within the same organization (Mazda) or with its products and services. Therefore, there is no information available to indicate a recurrence of the software failure incident within Mazda.
(b) The article does not provide information about similar incidents happening at other organizations or with their products and services. Hence, there is no mention of the software failure incident occurring again at multiple organizations. |
Phase (Design/Operation) |
unknown |
The article does not specifically mention any software failure incident related to the development phases (design or operation). Therefore, the information needed to determine whether the failure was due to design or operation factors is unknown. |
Boundary (Internal/External) |
within_system |
The software failure incident reported in Article 87005 is related to a wiring harness issue in Mazda vehicles. The failure is within_system as it is caused by a "weak retention force" in some wiring harness connector terminals within the vehicle's electrical system, leading to disruptions between different control modules [87005]. |
Nature (Human/Non-human) |
non-human_actions |
(a) The software failure incident in the article is related to non-human actions. The issue stemmed from a "weak retention force" in some wiring harness connector terminals, causing disruptions between different control modules in the car, leading to problems like turn signals not working, engine not restarting, or the passenger-side front airbag not deploying in a crash. These issues were not directly caused by human actions but rather by a flaw in the wiring harness connectors [87005]. |
Dimension (Hardware/Software) |
hardware |
(a) The software failure incident in the article is related to hardware. The issue stems from a "weak retention force" in some wiring harness connector terminals, causing disruptions between different control modules in the car [87005]. This hardware-related problem leads to various issues such as turn signals not working, engine not restarting, and passenger-side front airbag not deploying, highlighting the hardware origin of the failure. |
Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) |
non-malicious |
(a) The software failure incident reported in Article 87005 is non-malicious. The failure is attributed to a "weak retention force" in some wiring harness connector terminals in Mazda vehicles, causing disruptions between different control modules in the car. This issue leads to various problems such as turn signals not working, engine not restarting, or the passenger-side front airbag not deploying in a crash. Mazda has initiated a recall to address these safety hazards, indicating that the failure was not due to malicious intent but rather a technical flaw in the wiring harness connectors [87005]. |
Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) |
unknown |
The article does not mention any specific software failure incident related to poor decisions or accidental decisions. Therefore, the intent of the software failure incident in this case is unknown. |
Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) |
unknown |
The article does not mention any software failure incident related to development incompetence or accidental factors. Therefore, the information to answer this question is 'unknown'. |
Duration |
unknown |
The article does not mention any software failure incident related to the duration of the failure being permanent or temporary. Therefore, the information to determine whether the software failure incident was permanent or temporary is unknown. |
Behaviour |
crash, omission, other |
(a) crash: The article mentions that in some cases of the software failure incident related to the Mazda recall, the engine might not restart, indicating a failure due to the system losing state and not performing its intended functions [87005].
(b) omission: The article highlights that in some cases of the software failure incident, the turn signals may stop working, indicating a failure due to the system omitting to perform its intended functions at an instance(s) [87005].
(c) timing: The article does not provide information on the software failure incident being related to timing issues.
(d) value: The article does not mention the software failure incident being related to the system performing its intended functions incorrectly.
(e) byzantine: The article does not mention the software failure incident being related to the system behaving erroneously with inconsistent responses and interactions.
(f) other: The other behavior mentioned in the article is related to the passenger-side front airbag not deploying in a crash, which represents a unique safety hazard and could be categorized as a failure due to the system behaving in a way not described in the options (a to e) [87005]. |