Recurring |
one_organization |
(a) The software failure incident has happened again at one_organization:
The article mentions that British Airways has experienced IT problems in the past. In May 2017, the airline suffered major computer failures over the spring bank holiday weekend, leading to the cancellation of 726 flights and leaving tens of thousands of passengers stranded. This indicates that British Airways has faced similar IT issues in the past [88203].
(b) The software failure incident has happened again at multiple_organization:
There is no specific mention in the provided article about similar incidents happening at other organizations or with their products and services. Therefore, it is unknown if the software failure incident has occurred at multiple organizations. |
Phase (Design/Operation) |
operation |
(a) The software failure incident in the British Airways case seems to be related to the operation phase rather than the design phase. The incident was caused by an IT glitch that led to the cancellation of more than 100 flights and delays for over 200 others. The airline had to revert to using manual systems for check-in at airports, causing long queues and operational disruption [88203]. This indicates that the failure was more operational in nature, affecting the day-to-day functioning of the airline's systems rather than being a result of design flaws introduced during development. |
Boundary (Internal/External) |
within_system, outside_system |
From the provided articles, the software failure incident involving British Airways can be categorized as both within_system and outside_system:
(a) within_system: The article mentions that the IT glitch that caused flight cancellations and delays was due to issues with two separate systems within British Airways - one dealing with online check-in and the other with flight departures [88203].
(b) outside_system: The article also highlights that the software failure incident led to passengers being stranded, facing delays, and experiencing frustration due to the disruption caused by the IT glitch. This indicates that the contributing factors originating from outside the system, such as passenger inconvenience and financial losses, were significant consequences of the software failure incident [88203]. |
Nature (Human/Non-human) |
non-human_actions, human_actions |
(a) The software failure incident in the British Airways case was primarily due to non-human actions. The article mentions that the IT glitch caused more than 100 flights to be cancelled and over 200 others to be delayed. British Airways stated that the issue involved two separate systems - one dealing with online check-in and the other with flight departures. The problem led to the airline reverting to manual systems for check-in at airports, causing long queues and operational disruption [88203].
(b) The human actions also played a role in exacerbating the situation. Passengers expressed frustration on social media, and individuals like Sam Angeli had to spend significant amounts on hotel rooms due to the flight cancellations. The lack of communication from British Airways to affected passengers, as highlighted by Mr. Angeli, contributed to the overall dissatisfaction and chaos experienced by travelers. Additionally, the article mentions that musicians heading to a festival had to make last-minute changes to their travel plans, indicating the impact of human actions on their schedules [88203]. |
Dimension (Hardware/Software) |
software |
(a) The software failure incident occurring due to hardware:
- The article does not mention any specific hardware-related issues contributing to the software failure incident. Therefore, it is unknown if the incident occurred due to hardware-related factors.
(b) The software failure incident occurring due to software:
- The software failure incident in the article is attributed to an IT glitch affecting British Airways, leading to flight cancellations and delays. The glitch impacted systems related to online check-in and flight departures, indicating that the root cause of the failure originated in the software systems used by the airline [88203]. |
Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) |
non-malicious |
(a) The software failure incident reported in the news article about British Airways passengers being stranded after IT failures does not indicate any malicious intent behind the failure. The incident seems to be a non-malicious failure caused by IT glitches and issues with the airline's systems [88203]. |
Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) |
unknown |
(a) The software failure incident involving British Airways was not explicitly attributed to poor decisions. The article mainly focused on the IT glitch that caused flight cancellations and delays, leading to passengers being stranded and facing significant disruptions. There was no specific mention of poor decisions contributing to the incident [88203].
(b) The software failure incident involving British Airways was primarily described as an IT glitch that caused flight cancellations and delays, resulting in passengers being stranded and facing significant disruptions. The incident was not explicitly attributed to accidental decisions or mistakes. The focus was on the technical issues and operational disruptions caused by the IT glitch [88203]. |
Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) |
accidental |
(a) The software failure incident reported in the news article about British Airways passengers being stranded after IT failures does not explicitly mention development incompetence as a contributing factor. The incident seems to be more related to an IT glitch causing flight cancellations and delays, leading to manual check-in processes and operational disruptions [88203].
(b) The software failure incident at British Airways appears to be accidental, as it was described as an IT glitch that caused flight cancellations and delays. The article does not indicate any intentional actions leading to the failure, suggesting that the incident was accidental in nature [88203]. |
Duration |
temporary |
(a) The software failure incident in the article was temporary. The IT glitch that caused more than 100 flights to be cancelled and more than 200 others to be delayed was fixed by British Airways [88203]. The airline mentioned that flights were returning to normal, but there may still be "knock-on operational disruption" [88203]. Passengers were invited to rebook flights on any other day up to the following Tuesday, indicating that the issue was not permanent [88203].
(b) The software failure incident was temporary as it was caused by specific circumstances related to the IT glitch affecting online check-in and flight departures systems, rather than being a global problem [88203]. The article also mentions that the airline was working on getting passengers on alternative flights and providing them with food, drink, and accommodation if necessary due to the delays, which indicates a temporary nature of the incident [88203]. |
Behaviour |
crash, omission, other |
(a) crash: The software failure incident in the British Airways case led to a crash as the IT glitch caused more than 100 flights to be cancelled and more than 200 others to be delayed. This resulted in the system losing its state and not performing its intended functions, leading to operational disruption and long queues at airports [88203].
(b) omission: The software failure incident also involved omission as the problem caused British Airways to revert to using manual systems for check-in at airports, resulting in the system omitting to perform its intended functions efficiently, causing delays and inconvenience to passengers [88203].
(c) timing: There is no specific mention of a timing-related failure in the articles provided.
(d) value: The software failure incident did not involve the system performing its intended functions incorrectly.
(e) byzantine: The software failure incident did not exhibit behaviors of a byzantine failure where the system behaves erroneously with inconsistent responses and interactions.
(f) other: The other behavior observed in this software failure incident was the system causing knock-on operational disruption, affecting flights across the network but not at every airport. This behavior led to a widespread impact on flight operations and passenger travel plans [88203]. |