Incident: Ford MyFord Touch Infotainment System Class-Action Lawsuit Settlement

Published Date: 2019-08-08

Postmortem Analysis
Timeline 1. The software failure incident surrounding Ford's MyFord Touch infotainment system happened between 2011-2013 [Article 88963].
System 1. MyFord Touch infotainment system in 2011-2013 Ford and Lincoln vehicles [Article 88963]
Responsible Organization 1. Ford - Ford was responsible for causing the software failure incident related to the MyFord Touch infotainment system in their 2011-2013 vehicles [88963].
Impacted Organization 1. Owners and lessees of 2011-2013 Ford and Lincoln vehicles equipped with the MyFord Touch infotainment system [Article 88963].
Software Causes 1. Unresponsive behavior, crashing, and freezing of the MyFord Touch infotainment system while driving [Article 88963] 2. Inaccurate GPS information and inability to connect with a smartphone reported by users [Article 88963]
Non-software Causes 1. Unresponsive, crashing, and freezing infotainment system in 2011-2013 Ford and Lincoln vehicles [Article 88963] 2. Inaccurate GPS information and inability to connect with a smartphone [Article 88963]
Impacts 1. Owners and lessees of 2011-2013 Ford and Lincoln vehicles experienced unresponsive, crashing, and freezing infotainment systems while driving, along with issues such as inaccurate GPS information and inability to connect with smartphones [Article 88963]. 2. Ford settled a class-action lawsuit by agreeing to pay $17 million in compensation to affected individuals [Article 88963]. 3. Compensation amounts were based on the number of times an owner or lessee needed to service their vehicle for an infotainment system repair, ranging from $45 to $400 [Article 88963]. 4. Affected individuals in specific states were eligible to file a claim for compensation, while others would receive automatic reimbursement if they were the original vehicle owner [Article 88963].
Preventions 1. Conducting thorough testing and quality assurance before releasing the MyFord Touch infotainment system to ensure it is responsive, stable, and free from crashes [Article 88963]. 2. Implementing a robust feedback mechanism to gather user complaints and feedback early on to address any issues promptly before they escalate [Article 88963]. 3. Regular software updates and maintenance to address any bugs, glitches, or performance issues reported by users [Article 88963].
Fixes 1. Improving software testing procedures to catch bugs and issues before the product is released [88963]. 2. Implementing better quality control measures during the development process to ensure the infotainment system is responsive and stable [88963]. 3. Providing timely software updates and patches to address any existing issues and improve overall performance [88963]. 4. Enhancing user feedback mechanisms to quickly identify and address any emerging problems with the infotainment system [88963].
References 1. Law firm Hagens Berman [Article 88963]

Software Taxonomy of Faults

Category Option Rationale
Recurring one_organization (a) The software failure incident related to Ford's MyFord Touch infotainment system is an example of a software failure incident that happened again within the same organization. The article mentions that Ford settled a class-action lawsuit surrounding the MyFord Touch system, which was notorious for being unresponsive, crashing, freezing, providing inaccurate GPS information, and having issues connecting with smartphones [Article 88963]. This indicates a recurring software failure issue within Ford's products and services. (b) The article does not provide information about the software failure incident happening again at multiple organizations or with their products and services.
Phase (Design/Operation) design, operation (a) The software failure incident related to the design phase can be seen in the article as the MyFord Touch infotainment system in 2011-2013 Ford and Lincoln vehicles was notorious for being unresponsive, crashing, freezing while driving, providing inaccurate GPS information, and having an inability to connect with a smartphone. These issues indicate failures introduced during the system development or updates [Article 88963]. (b) The software failure incident related to the operation phase can be inferred from the complaints mentioned in the article, such as the system crashing and freezing while driving. This indicates failures introduced by the operation or misuse of the system [Article 88963].
Boundary (Internal/External) within_system (a) within_system: The software failure incident related to Ford's MyFord Touch infotainment system was within the system itself. The system was notorious for being unresponsive, crashing, freezing while driving, providing inaccurate GPS information, and having issues connecting with smartphones [88963]. These issues were internal to the infotainment system and not caused by external factors.
Nature (Human/Non-human) non-human_actions (a) The software failure incident in this case was primarily due to non-human actions. The MyFord Touch infotainment system in 2011-2013 Ford and Lincoln vehicles was reported to be unresponsive, crashing, freezing, providing inaccurate GPS information, and having issues connecting with smartphones. These issues were likely caused by software bugs, faults, or defects within the system itself, rather than being directly introduced by human actions [88963].
Dimension (Hardware/Software) hardware, software (a) The software failure incident related to hardware: - The article mentions that the MyFord Touch infotainment system in 2011-2013 Ford and Lincoln vehicles was notorious for being unresponsive, crashing, and freezing while driving, indicating hardware-related issues [Article 88963]. (b) The software failure incident related to software: - The same article highlights complaints about inaccurate GPS information, the inability to connect with a smartphone, and overall dissatisfaction with the MyFord Touch system, pointing towards software-related issues [Article 88963].
Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) non-malicious (a) The software failure incident related to the Ford MyFord Touch infotainment system can be categorized as non-malicious. The system was reported to be unresponsive, crashing, freezing, providing inaccurate GPS information, and having issues connecting with smartphones. These issues were causing inconvenience and dissatisfaction among the users, leading to a class-action lawsuit and subsequent compensation for affected owners and lessees [88963].
Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) poor_decisions (a) The software failure incident related to the MyFord Touch infotainment system in Ford and Lincoln vehicles from 2011-2013 can be attributed to poor decisions made during the development and implementation of the system. The system was notorious for being unresponsive, crashing, freezing while driving, providing inaccurate GPS information, and having issues connecting with smartphones. These issues led to numerous complaints and ultimately a class-action lawsuit settlement where Ford agreed to pay $17 million in compensation to affected owners and lessees [Article 88963].
Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) development_incompetence, unknown (a) The software failure incident related to development incompetence is evident in the article as it mentions the MyFord Touch infotainment system being notorious for being unresponsive, crashing, freezing while driving, providing inaccurate GPS information, and having the total inability to connect with a smartphone [Article 88963]. These issues indicate a lack of professional competence in the development of the infotainment system, leading to significant user dissatisfaction and the need for multiple repairs. (b) The software failure incident related to accidental factors is not explicitly mentioned in the provided article.
Duration temporary (a) The software failure incident related to the MyFord Touch infotainment system in Ford and Lincoln vehicles from 2011-2013 was not permanent but rather temporary. The system was notorious for being unresponsive, crashing, freezing while driving, providing inaccurate GPS information, and having an inability to connect with smartphones. This indicates that the failure was due to contributing factors introduced by certain circumstances but not all, rather than being a permanent issue [Article 88963].
Behaviour crash, other (a) crash: The article mentions that the MyFord Touch infotainment system was notorious for being unresponsive, crashing, and freezing while driving [88963]. (b) omission: The article does not specifically mention any instances of the system omitting to perform its intended functions at an instance(s). (c) timing: The article does not mention any instances of the system performing its intended functions correctly but too late or too early. (d) value: The article does not mention any instances of the system performing its intended functions incorrectly. (e) byzantine: The article does not mention any instances of the system behaving erroneously with inconsistent responses and interactions. (f) other: The other behavior described in the article is the inaccurate GPS information and the total inability to connect with a smartphone reported by users of the MyFord Touch infotainment system [88963].

IoT System Layer

Layer Option Rationale
Perception None None
Communication None None
Application None None

Other Details

Category Option Rationale
Consequence property (a) death: People lost their lives due to the software failure (b) harm: People were physically harmed due to the software failure (c) basic: People's access to food or shelter was impacted because of the software failure (d) property: People's material goods, money, or data was impacted due to the software failure (e) delay: People had to postpone an activity due to the software failure (f) non-human: Non-human entities were impacted due to the software failure (g) no_consequence: There were no real observed consequences of the software failure (h) theoretical_consequence: There were potential consequences discussed of the software failure that did not occur (i) other: Was there consequence(s) of the software failure not described in the (a to h) options? What is the other consequence(s)? The articles do not mention any consequences related to death, harm, basic needs, property loss, or non-human entities due to the software failure incident with Ford's MyFord Touch infotainment system. The main consequence discussed is related to financial compensation for owners and lessees affected by the system's issues, such as unresponsiveness, crashing, freezing, inaccurate GPS information, and connectivity problems with smartphones [88963].
Domain transportation (a) The failed system was related to the transportation industry, specifically in-car technology for Ford and Lincoln vehicles. The MyFord Touch infotainment system in 2011-2013 vehicles was reported to be unresponsive, crashing, freezing, and having issues with GPS information and smartphone connectivity while driving [Article 88963].

Sources

Back to List