Incident: Tesla Autopilot Slows for Green Lights, Raises Safety Concerns

Published Date: 2020-04-27

Postmortem Analysis
Timeline 1. The software failure incident with Tesla's Autopilot system slowing down for green lights was reported in the article published on 2020-04-27 [Article 98774]. 2. Steps to estimate the timeline: - Step 1: The article mentions that last Friday, Tesla drivers first reported receiving a software update that included the new feature. - Step 2: The article was published on 2020-04-27. - Step 3: Based on the information provided, the incident likely occurred on Friday before the article was published, which would be around April 24, 2020.
System 1. Autopilot software version for Tesla vehicles [Article 98774]
Responsible Organization 1. Tesla [98774]
Impacted Organization 1. Tesla drivers [Article 98774] 2. Other drivers on the road who may not expect a Tesla to slow down at green lights [Article 98774]
Software Causes 1. The software failure incident was caused by the Tesla Autopilot's latest version, specifically the "Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control" feature, which was designed to slow down and stop the vehicle for visible traffic lights or stop signs [98774].
Non-software Causes 1. Lack of clear communication and transparency from Tesla regarding the beta status of the software update [98774]. 2. Concerns raised by experts about the potential for accidents due to other drivers not expecting a Tesla to slow down at green lights [98774]. 3. Criticism from the National Transportation Safety Board regarding Tesla's approach to autonomous driving features and the need for better ways to sense driver distraction [98774].
Impacts 1. The software failure incident led to Tesla's autonomous driving software, Autopilot, slowing down for green lights in addition to stopping at red lights, potentially causing confusion and unexpected behavior for drivers [98774]. 2. The incident raised concerns about the safety implications of the software flaw, with experts warning that it could lead to traffic crashes as other drivers may not anticipate a Tesla slowing down at a green light [98774]. 3. The flawed software feature may have lured drivers into a false sense of security and complacency, potentially increasing the risk of accidents as drivers may not be prepared for the system's unexpected behavior [98774].
Preventions 1. Thorough Testing: Conducting extensive testing, including real-world scenarios and edge cases, could have helped identify and address the issues with Tesla's Autopilot software before releasing it to the public [98774]. 2. Regulatory Oversight: Stronger regulations and oversight from regulatory bodies could have prevented the premature release of unfinished software like Tesla's Autopilot, ensuring that only fully tested and safe features are made available to consumers [98774]. 3. Transparent Communication: Clear and transparent communication from Tesla about the limitations and risks associated with the beta version of the Autopilot software could have helped manage driver expectations and prevent potential accidents or misunderstandings [98774].
Fixes 1. Implement rigorous testing procedures before releasing beta software to the public to ensure that critical features like stopping at traffic lights are functioning correctly [98774]. 2. Enhance the artificial intelligence algorithms powering the autonomous driving software to better differentiate between red and green lights, ensuring the vehicle only stops when necessary [98774]. 3. Provide clear and accurate communication to Tesla drivers about the limitations and potential risks of the beta software, emphasizing the need for continued attention and readiness to take immediate action [98774].
References 1. Tesla drivers who reported experiencing the issue firsthand [Article 98774] 2. Missy Cummings, a Duke University professor who studies autonomous systems [Article 98774] 3. Paul Godsmark, chief technology officer of CAVCOE, the Canadian Automated Vehicles Centre of Excellence [Article 98774]

Software Taxonomy of Faults

Category Option Rationale
Recurring one_organization (a) The software failure incident related to Tesla's Autopilot system slowing down for green lights is an example of a failure within the same organization. This incident highlights a flaw in Tesla's autonomous driving software, specifically in the Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control feature, where the system incorrectly slows down for green lights, causing potential safety concerns for drivers [98774]. (b) The incident involving Tesla's Autopilot system slowing down for green lights does not directly indicate a similar failure occurring at other organizations. The focus of the article is primarily on Tesla's software issue and the potential risks associated with it, rather than discussing similar incidents at other companies [98774].
Phase (Design/Operation) design, operation (a) The software failure incident related to the design phase can be seen in the article where Tesla released a software update for its Autopilot feature, specifically the "Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control." This update was described as being in "beta," meaning it was unfinished and still officially in testing. Despite being in this testing phase, Tesla drivers reported issues with the software, such as the system slowing down for green lights and not stopping when it should at traffic controls. Missy Cummings, a Duke University professor, highlighted that the feature may lead to traffic crashes due to significant defects in the software [Article 98774]. (b) The software failure incident related to the operation phase is evident in the same article where concerns were raised about how the new Tesla feature could lull drivers into a sense of complacency. Paul Godsmark, the chief technology officer of CAVCOE, expressed his worry that drivers might become too reliant on the system, leading to crashes when the system's flaws surface unexpectedly. This indicates that the failure was partly due to the operation or potential misuse of the system by drivers [Article 98774].
Boundary (Internal/External) within_system (a) within_system: The software failure incident related to Tesla's Autopilot system slowing down for green lights when it shouldn't and potentially not stopping at traffic controls is primarily within the system. This issue is attributed to the beta version of the Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control feature, which is part of Tesla's autonomous driving software [98774]. The incident stems from the software's algorithm and decision-making process within the Autopilot system itself, leading to unintended behavior such as slowing down for green lights and potential failures to stop at traffic controls.
Nature (Human/Non-human) non-human_actions, human_actions (a) The software failure incident related to non-human actions can be seen in the case of Tesla's Autopilot software slowing down for green lights in addition to stopping at red lights. This behavior was reported by Tesla drivers after receiving a software update that included "Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control" [Article 98774]. (b) The software failure incident related to human actions can be observed in the decision-making process of releasing the beta version of the Autopilot software to the public by Tesla. Missy Cummings, a Duke University professor, criticized Tesla for releasing unfinished software to the public, highlighting the significant defects in the system. She raised concerns about the potential for traffic crashes due to the software's flaws and questioned whether regulators should allow such software to be released [Article 98774].
Dimension (Hardware/Software) software (a) The software failure incident related to hardware: - The article does not mention any hardware-related issues contributing to the software failure incident. It primarily focuses on the issues with Tesla's Autopilot software, such as slowing down for green lights and potential safety concerns ([Article 98774]). (b) The software failure incident related to software: - The software failure incident discussed in the article is primarily attributed to issues within Tesla's Autopilot software. The article highlights how the software update for "Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control" led to unintended behaviors, such as slowing down for green lights and potential failures to stop at traffic controls as intended. The article also mentions concerns raised by experts about the software's defects and the risks associated with releasing unfinished software to the public ([Article 98774]).
Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) non-malicious (a) The software failure incident described in the article does not appear to be malicious. Rather, it seems to be a non-malicious failure caused by the introduction of contributing factors without the intent to harm the system. The incident is related to Tesla's Autopilot software update, specifically the "Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control" feature, which is described as being in beta and still officially in testing. The feature is designed to slow down and stop the vehicle for visible traffic lights or stop signs. However, Tesla drivers have reported issues such as the system slowing down for green lights and not stopping when it should, raising concerns about potential traffic crashes and the system's flaws [Article 98774].
Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) poor_decisions (a) The intent of the software failure incident related to poor_decisions: - The incident with Tesla's Autopilot software slowing down for green lights, which it shouldn't do, can be attributed to poor decisions made in releasing unfinished software to the public (Article 98774). - Missy Cummings, a Duke University professor, criticized the feature, stating that there's no upside to this software and that it's known to have significant defects. She questioned whether regulators should allow unfinished software to be released to the public, highlighting the poor decision-making in releasing such a feature (Article 98774).
Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) development_incompetence, accidental (a) The software failure incident related to development incompetence is evident in the case of Tesla's Autopilot software update. The article mentions that the latest version of Autopilot, which includes the "Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control" feature, was described as being in "beta," meaning it's unfinished and still officially in testing. Despite being in beta, the software was released to the general public, with known significant defects. Missy Cummings, a Duke University professor, criticized the release of the feature, stating that there's no upside to this software and that regulators should question allowing unfinished software to be released to the public [98774]. (b) The software failure incident related to accidental factors is highlighted by the unintended consequences of the Autopilot software update. Tesla drivers reported that the system not only stopped at red lights but also slowed down for green lights, which was not the intended behavior. This unintended slowing down for green lights could potentially lead to traffic crashes, as other drivers may not expect a Tesla to slow down at a green light. Additionally, Tesla warns that the Autopilot feature may not stop the car when it should, indicating accidental flaws in the software's behavior [98774].
Duration temporary The software failure incident described in the article is more likely to be temporary rather than permanent. This is evident from the fact that the issue is related to a specific software update that Tesla drivers received, which included the "Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control" feature. The article mentions that Tesla describes this software as being in "beta," meaning it's unfinished and still officially in testing. Additionally, Tesla owners have reported issues with the software, such as the car slowing down for green lights and not stopping when it should, indicating that the failure is temporary and related to the specific circumstances surrounding the introduction of this new feature [98774].
Behaviour omission, value, other (a) crash: The software failure incident described in the article does not involve a crash where the system loses state and does not perform any of its intended functions. The Tesla Autopilot software, although exhibiting issues with stopping at traffic lights and signs, is still functioning to some extent, albeit with incorrect behavior [Article 98774]. (b) omission: The software failure incident can be categorized under omission as the Tesla Autopilot software omits to perform its intended functions correctly at instances. It slows down for green lights, which it shouldn't, and may not stop the car when it should at traffic controls, leading to potential safety risks [Article 98774]. (c) timing: The software failure incident is not related to timing issues where the system performs its intended functions correctly but at the wrong time. Instead, the issue lies in the incorrect behavior of the software in responding to traffic lights and signs [Article 98774]. (d) value: The software failure incident falls under the category of value as the Tesla Autopilot software is performing its intended functions incorrectly. It slows down for green lights and may not stop the car when necessary, leading to potential safety hazards and driver confusion [Article 98774]. (e) byzantine: The software failure incident does not exhibit characteristics of a byzantine failure where the system behaves erroneously with inconsistent responses and interactions. The issues with the Tesla Autopilot software are more related to incorrect behavior rather than inconsistent responses [Article 98774]. (f) other: The other behavior exhibited by the software failure incident is the release of unfinished software to the public. Tesla's Autopilot software is described as being in "beta," meaning it is unfinished and still officially in testing. This raises concerns about the safety and reliability of releasing such software with known defects to the general public [Article 98774].

IoT System Layer

Layer Option Rationale
Perception sensor, processing_unit, embedded_software (a) sensor: The software failure incident related to Tesla's Autopilot system slowing down for green lights when it shouldn't could be attributed to sensor errors. The system's sensors may be incorrectly perceiving the green lights as requiring the vehicle to slow down, leading to this unexpected behavior [98774]. (c) processing_unit: The incident could also be related to processing errors within the Autopilot system. The software's processing unit may be incorrectly interpreting the sensor data related to traffic lights, leading to the system slowing down for green lights [98774]. (e) embedded_software: Additionally, the failure could be linked to errors in the embedded software of Tesla's Autopilot system. The embedded software controlling the behavior of the system may have bugs or flaws that are causing the vehicle to slow down inappropriately at green lights [98774].
Communication unknown Unknown
Application FALSE The software failure incident described in the articles related to Tesla's Autopilot system slowing down for green lights when it shouldn't and potentially not stopping at all traffic controls does not directly indicate a failure at the application layer of the cyber physical system. The issues mentioned seem to be more related to the functionality and behavior of the autonomous driving software itself rather than bugs, operating system errors, unhandled exceptions, or incorrect usage typically associated with application layer failures. Therefore, based on the information provided in the articles, it is unknown whether the failure was specifically related to the application layer of the cyber physical system [Article 98774].

Other Details

Category Option Rationale
Consequence theoretical_consequence (a) death: People lost their lives due to the software failure - There is no mention of any deaths resulting from the software failure incident reported in the articles. [Article 98774] (b) harm: People were physically harmed due to the software failure - There is no mention of any physical harm to individuals due to the software failure incident reported in the articles. [Article 98774] (c) basic: People's access to food or shelter was impacted because of the software failure - There is no mention of people's access to food or shelter being impacted by the software failure incident reported in the articles. [Article 98774] (d) property: People's material goods, money, or data was impacted due to the software failure - The software failure incident did not directly impact people's material goods, money, or data as reported in the articles. [Article 98774] (e) delay: People had to postpone an activity due to the software failure - The software failure incident did not lead to any reported delays in activities as described in the articles. [Article 98774] (f) non-human: Non-human entities were impacted due to the software failure - The software failure incident primarily involved Tesla's autonomous driving software, impacting the functionality of vehicles, but there is no mention of non-human entities being directly impacted. [Article 98774] (g) no_consequence: There were no real observed consequences of the software failure - The articles highlight potential consequences and concerns raised by experts regarding the software failure incident, but there is no mention of any real observed consequences resulting from the incident. [Article 98774] (h) theoretical_consequence: There were potential consequences discussed of the software failure that did not occur - The articles discuss potential consequences of the software failure incident, such as the risk of traffic crashes, lulling drivers into complacency, and the need for regulators to address the release of unfinished software to the public. These consequences were theoretical and discussed as possibilities rather than actual occurrences. [Article 98774] (i) other: Was there consequence(s) of the software failure not described in the (a to h) options? What is the other consequence(s)? - There are no other specific consequences of the software failure incident mentioned in the articles beyond those covered in the options (a) to (h). [Article 98774]
Domain transportation (a) The failed system in this incident is related to the transportation industry. The software failure incident involves Tesla's Autopilot, an autonomous driving software designed to assist drivers in navigating roads and traffic signals [Article 98774].

Sources

Back to List