Incident: Brain-Computer Interface Vulnerability to Hackers: Implications and Risks

Published Date: 2020-08-05

Postmortem Analysis
Timeline 1. The software failure incident mentioned in the article happened in August 2020. Therefore, the estimated timeline for the software failure incident is August 2020.
System The software failure incident reported in the article [104429] highlights potential vulnerabilities in the brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) being developed by Neuralink. The systems that failed in this incident are: 1. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) developed by Neuralink, specifically the technology allowing human brains to interface with computers. 2. Security protocols within the BCIs that were not robust enough to prevent unauthorized access by hackers. 3. Lack of encryption and antivirus software within the BCIs to protect against cyber attacks and data interception. 4. Potential vulnerabilities in the design and implementation of the BCI technology, including the risk of malicious software being transmitted to the devices. These failures indicate a need for stronger security measures and a multi-layered security approach in the design and development of brain-computer interfaces to prevent unauthorized access and protect sensitive data.
Responsible Organization 1. Cybercriminals were identified as the entity responsible for causing the potential software failure incident in the form of hacking into brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) as reported in Article 104429. [104429]
Impacted Organization 1. Individuals who could potentially have their skills erased or thoughts and memories accessed by hackers due to vulnerabilities in the brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) [104429] 2. Political officials, military personnel, and other individuals whose thoughts or memories could be invaded by hackers [104429]
Software Causes 1. Lack of robust security protocols in the brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) developed by Neuralink, making them vulnerable to hackers [104429]. 2. Potential for hackers to intercept data traveling from the BCI to the brain, leading to the gathering of sensitive information such as logins for emails and other systems [104429]. 3. Possibility of malicious software being transmitted to the technology, enabling attackers to manipulate the user's neural inputs and control the BCI [104429].
Non-software Causes 1. The vulnerability of the brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) to hackers due to the design and implementation of the technology [104429]. 2. Potential physical damage to the brain caused by attacks on the BCIs, leading to disruptions in skills and thinking processes [104429]. 3. Possibility of unauthorized access to sensitive data and information, such as logins for emails and other systems, through intercepted data traveling from the BCI to the brain [104429].
Impacts 1. The software failure incident reported in the article highlighted the potential impacts of hackers accessing brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) developed by Neuralink, leading to vulnerabilities such as erasing skills and reading thoughts or memories [104429]. 2. The breach could result in severe consequences such as disrupting skills, damaging neurons, and potentially leading to a rewiring process within the brain that disrupts thinking [104429]. 3. Hackers could intercept data traveling from the BCI to the brain, allowing them to gather sensitive information like logins for emails and other systems, posing a significant privacy and security risk [104429]. 4. Malicious software could be transmitted to the technology, enabling attackers to manipulate the user's neural inputs, showing fake images or controlling the BCI, emphasizing the need for robust security measures [104429].
Preventions 1. Implementing robust security protocols similar to those found in smartphones, such as encryption and antivirus software, to ensure unauthorized access is prevented [104429]. 2. Taking a multi-layered security approach when designing brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) to protect against potential attacks and breaches [104429].
Fixes 1. Implementing security protocols similar to those found in smartphones, such as encryption and antivirus software [104429].
References 1. Experts interviewed by Zdnet [104429] 2. Dr. Sasitharan Balasubramaniam, director of research at the Waterford Institute of Technology's Telecommunication Software and Systems Group (TSSG) [104429]

Software Taxonomy of Faults

Category Option Rationale
Recurring one_organization (a) The software failure incident having happened again at one_organization: - Elon Musk's startup Neuralink, which is working on brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), is facing concerns about the security of the technology [104429]. - Experts have warned that the BCIs being developed by Neuralink could leave individuals vulnerable to hackers who could potentially access and manipulate their thoughts or memories [104429]. - The need for ensuring security in the technology to prevent unauthorized access and modifications has been emphasized, similar to security protocols used in smartphones such as encryption and antivirus software [104429]. (b) The software failure incident having happened again at multiple_organization: - There is no specific mention in the provided article about a similar incident happening at other organizations or with their products and services.
Phase (Design/Operation) design, operation (a) The article discusses potential software failure incidents related to the design phase of the brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) being developed by Elon Musk's Neuralink. The report warns that these implants could leave individuals vulnerable to hackers who could access the BCIs to erase skills, read thoughts or memories, and carry out digital attacks [104429]. (b) The article also mentions potential software failure incidents related to the operation phase of the BCIs. It highlights that hackers could intercept data traveling from the BCI to the brain, gather sensitive information like logins, transmit malicious software to control the BCI, and manipulate neural inputs. This indicates that software failures could occur due to factors introduced by the operation or misuse of the system [104429].
Boundary (Internal/External) within_system (a) within_system: The software failure incident discussed in the articles is related to potential vulnerabilities within the brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) being developed by Elon Musk's Neuralink. Experts warn that cybercriminals could access these BCIs to erase skills, read thoughts or memories, and carry out digital attacks [104429]. The failure originates from within the system design and implementation, highlighting the importance of ensuring security measures within the technology itself to prevent unauthorized access and potential harm.
Nature (Human/Non-human) non-human_actions, human_actions (a) The software failure incident related to non-human actions in the articles is the vulnerability of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) developed by Neuralink to hacking and potential breaches. Experts warn that cybercriminals could access these BCIs to erase skills, read thoughts or memories, and carry out digital attacks without human participation [104429]. (b) The software failure incident related to human actions in the articles is the potential risks associated with the design and implementation of the brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) by Neuralink. Researchers highlight concerns about the security vulnerabilities introduced by human actions in the development of the technology, such as the possibility of hackers invading thoughts or memories, intercepting data, and transmitting malicious software to control the BCIs [104429].
Dimension (Hardware/Software) hardware, software (a) The software failure incident occurring due to hardware: - The article discusses the potential vulnerability of Elon Musk's Neuralink brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) to hackers, which could lead to erasing skills and reading thoughts or memories [104429]. - It is mentioned that hackers could intercept data traveling from the BCI to the brain, allowing them to gather sensitive data such as logins for emails and other systems [104429]. (b) The software failure incident occurring due to software: - The article highlights the need for secure technology to prevent unauthorized access and modification of the BCIs' functionality, suggesting the use of security protocols like encryption and antivirus software [104429]. - Researchers warn about the possibility of malicious software being transmitted to the technology, enabling attackers to show the user images or feed fake versions of neural inputs to control the BCI [104429].
Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) malicious (a) The objective of the software failure incident was malicious, as it involved the potential for hackers to access brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) to erase skills, read thoughts or memories, and carry out digital attacks [104429]. The article highlights the risks associated with malicious attacks on the technology, emphasizing the need for robust security measures to prevent unauthorized access and manipulation of the brain-computer interfaces. (b) The software failure incident was non-malicious in the sense that it was not caused by unintentional errors or faults in the system. Instead, the focus was on the intentional threat posed by cybercriminals who could exploit vulnerabilities in the technology to breach privacy, manipulate data, and potentially cause physical harm by disrupting brain functions [104429]. The emphasis was on the need for multi-layered security approaches, similar to those used in smartphones, to protect against malicious attacks on the brain-computer interfaces.
Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) poor_decisions (a) The intent of the software failure incident related to poor_decisions: - The software failure incident in this case is related to poor decisions made in the design and implementation of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) by Neuralink, a startup founded by Elon Musk [104429]. - Experts warn that the implants developed by Neuralink could leave individuals vulnerable to hackers who could potentially erase skills, read thoughts or memories, and carry out digital attacks [104429]. - The report highlights the need for ensuring that no unauthorized person can modify the functionality of the BCIs, indicating a lack of robust security measures in the design process [104429]. - The potential consequences of a cyberattack on these BCIs include damage to the brain, disruption of skills, and even physical damage that could lead to a rewiring process within the brain, affecting thinking abilities [104429]. - Researchers emphasize the importance of a multi-layered security approach, including antivirus software and encryption, to mitigate the risks associated with the vulnerabilities in the BCI technology [104429].
Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) development_incompetence (a) The article discusses the potential software failure incident related to development incompetence in the context of Elon Musk's Neuralink project. It highlights the vulnerability of the brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) being developed by Neuralink to hacking and unauthorized access. Experts warn that cybercriminals could potentially erase skills, read thoughts or memories, and carry out digital attacks by exploiting these BCIs [104429]. (b) The article also touches upon the accidental aspect of the software failure incident, mentioning the risks associated with the technology being too good to be true. Researchers have raised concerns about the potential consequences of attacks on the brain chips, such as damaging neurons, disrupting skills, and causing physical harm to the brain [104429].
Duration unknown The articles do not provide information about a software failure incident being either permanent or temporary.
Behaviour other (a) crash: The articles do not mention any software failure incident related to a crash. (b) omission: The articles do not mention any software failure incident related to omission. (c) timing: The articles do not mention any software failure incident related to timing. (d) value: The articles do not mention any software failure incident related to value. (e) byzantine: The articles do not mention any software failure incident related to a byzantine behavior. (f) other: The articles discuss the potential software failure incident related to hackers being able to intercept data traveling from the brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) to the brain, allowing them to gather sensitive data such as logins for emails and other systems. This could lead to the system performing its intended functions incorrectly by exposing sensitive information to unauthorized individuals [104429].

IoT System Layer

Layer Option Rationale
Perception unknown The articles do not provide specific information about a software failure incident related to the perception layer of the cyber physical system that failed.
Communication unknown The articles do not provide information about a software failure incident related to the communication layer of the cyber physical system that failed at either the link level or connectivity level.
Application FALSE The software failure incident described in the articles is not related to the application layer of the cyber physical system. The incident discussed pertains to the potential vulnerability of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) developed by Neuralink, founded by Elon Musk, to hacking and unauthorized access by cybercriminals. The focus is on the security risks associated with these BCIs and the potential consequences of such breaches, rather than a failure at the application layer of a cyber physical system [104429].

Other Details

Category Option Rationale
Consequence harm, property, theoretical_consequence (a) unknown (b) unknown (c) unknown (d) [104429] The article discusses the potential consequences of a software failure incident related to brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) developed by Neuralink. It mentions that if hackers were to access these BCIs, they could potentially erase skills, read thoughts or memories, invade the minds of political officials and military personnel, disrupt thinking processes, and cause physical damage to the brain. Additionally, hackers could intercept sensitive data and manipulate neural inputs, leading to potential harm and property loss for individuals using the technology. (e) unknown (f) unknown (g) unknown (h) [104429] The article discusses theoretical consequences of the software failure incident, highlighting the potential risks and vulnerabilities associated with BCIs if they were to be compromised by hackers. It raises concerns about the unprecedented nature of such breaches and the various ways in which attackers could exploit the technology to gather sensitive data, manipulate neural inputs, and potentially cause harm to individuals using the BCIs. (i) unknown
Domain information (a) The failed system in this incident is related to the industry of information. The article discusses how the brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) developed by Neuralink could potentially be vulnerable to hackers, leading to unauthorized access to thoughts, memories, and skills of individuals [104429]. This incident highlights the importance of ensuring the security of systems that handle sensitive information, such as those involved in the production and distribution of information.

Sources

Back to List