Recurring |
one_organization, multiple_organization |
(a) The software failure incident having happened again at one_organization:
- The article mentions a ransomware attack in Gainesville, Georgia, that locked up the voter signature verification systems, forcing poll workers to resort to manual verification [106008].
- Internal emails revealed that the Georgia secretary of state's office disabled two-factor authentication after facing issues with the election software, which is a security measure recommended by the Homeland Security Department [106008].
(b) The software failure incident having happened again at multiple_organization:
- The article discusses various cyberattacks targeting election systems in different states, including Georgia, California, Indiana, and Louisiana, indicating a pattern of attacks across multiple organizations [106008]. |
Phase (Design/Operation) |
design |
(a) The article mentions a software failure incident related to the design phase when a ransomware attack in Gainesville, Georgia, locked up the voter signature verification systems, forcing poll workers to resort to manual methods [106008]. This incident was a result of weak spots in Georgia's election systems, including the disabling of two-factor authentication by the Georgia secretary of state's office after the election software faced challenges with early voters' volume.
(b) The article does not provide specific information about a software failure incident related to the operation phase caused by factors introduced by the operation or misuse of the system. |
Boundary (Internal/External) |
within_system, outside_system |
(a) within_system: The software failure incident related to the ransomware attack in Gainesville, Georgia, which locked up the voter signature verification systems, was a result of factors originating from within the system. The attack, although not directed at the election, took down election systems as collateral damage, exposing weak spots in Georgia's election infrastructure [106008].
(b) outside_system: The article mentions that Russian hackers targeted various election systems in different states, such as Georgia, California, Indiana, and Louisiana. These attacks were initiated by external factors, specifically Russian hackers, who breached local networks and election systems [106008]. |
Nature (Human/Non-human) |
non-human_actions, human_actions |
(a) The software failure incident occurring due to non-human actions:
- The incident in Georgia involved a ransomware attack that locked up the voter signature verification systems, leading to poll workers having to resort to manual verification methods [106008].
- The ransomware attack in Gainesville, Ga., that affected the voter signature verification systems was not specifically directed at the election but caused collateral damage by taking down election systems [106008].
(b) The software failure incident occurring due to human actions:
- Internal emails revealed that the Georgia secretary of state's office disabled two-factor authentication in recent weeks after facing issues with the election software, which was struggling under the volume of early voters. This action of turning off two-factor authentication introduced a vulnerability that could have contributed to the software failure incident [106008]. |
Dimension (Hardware/Software) |
hardware, software |
(a) The software failure incident related to hardware:
- The article mentions a ransomware attack in Gainesville, Georgia, that locked up the voter signature verification systems, forcing poll workers to resort to manual methods [106008].
- It is highlighted that the attack in Gainesville, Georgia, was not directed at the election but affected election systems as collateral damage, indicating a hardware-related failure [106008].
(b) The software failure incident related to software:
- The article discusses how the Georgia secretary of state's office disabled two-factor authentication in recent weeks after facing issues with election software, which could be considered a software-related failure [106008]. |
Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) |
malicious, non-malicious |
(a) The objective of the software failure incident was malicious, as it involved Russian hackers conducting ransomware attacks on various systems related to the election process, including voter signature verification databases and Trump campaign websites [106008].
(b) The software failure incident was also non-malicious in nature, as it highlighted vulnerabilities in the election systems that could be exploited by attackers to sow doubt about the legitimacy of the election results, without necessarily intending direct harm to the systems themselves [106008]. |
Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) |
poor_decisions, accidental_decisions |
(a) The intent of the software failure incident related to poor decisions can be seen in the case of the ransomware attack in Gainesville, Georgia, where the voter signature verification systems were locked up. Internal emails revealed that the Georgia secretary of state's office disabled two-factor authentication after the election software was struggling with the influx of early voters, which was a poor decision that left the system vulnerable to attacks [106008].
(b) The accidental decisions contributing to the software failure incident are evident in the case of the ransomware attack in Gainesville, Georgia. The attack, which locked up the voter signature verification systems, was not directed at the election but caused collateral damage by taking down election systems. This unintended consequence exposed weak spots in Georgia's election infrastructure, highlighting the accidental nature of the failure [106008]. |
Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) |
accidental |
(a) The articles do not provide information about a software failure incident occurring due to development incompetence.
(b) The software failure incident related to accidental factors is the ransomware attack in Gainesville, Georgia, which locked up the voter signature verification systems, forcing poll workers to resort to manual methods [106008]. This incident was not directed at the election but affected election systems as collateral damage, highlighting continued weak spots in Georgia's election infrastructure. Additionally, internal emails revealed that the Georgia secretary of state's office disabled two-factor authentication after facing issues with the election software, which was a critical security measure [106008]. |
Duration |
temporary |
The software failure incident mentioned in the articles is temporary. The incident involved a ransomware attack in Gainesville, Georgia, which locked up the voter signature verification systems, forcing poll workers to resort to manual processes [106008]. This indicates that the failure was due to specific circumstances, such as the ransomware attack, rather than being a permanent failure introduced by all circumstances. |
Behaviour |
crash, byzantine |
(a) crash: The article mentions a ransomware attack in Gainesville, Georgia, that "locked up the voter signature verification systems" last week, forcing poll workers to resort to manual methods [106008].
(b) omission: The article discusses concerns about potential attacks on voter registration, verification, and vote reporting systems, which could sow doubt about the legitimacy of the election by delaying results or affecting the reporting of results [106008].
(c) timing: The article does not specifically mention any failures related to timing.
(d) value: The article does not provide information about failures due to the system performing its intended functions incorrectly.
(e) byzantine: The article mentions the behavior of a Russian group called Energetic Bear, which has breached various systems including a nuclear power plant in Kansas and web systems at San Francisco International Airport, indicating inconsistent responses and interactions [106008].
(f) other: The article does not describe any other specific behavior of the software failure incident. |