Incident: Collapse of Mt. Gox Bitcoin Exchange Due to Theft and Mismanagement

Published Date: 2014-02-27

Postmortem Analysis
Timeline 1. The software failure incident at Mt. Gox occurred in 2014 [Article 24490, Article 24332, Article 24531]. 2. The incident at BitMart, where cybercriminals stole the equivalent of $150 million, happened recently [Article 122261].
System 1. Bitcoin protocol's transaction malleability issue [24327, 24332] 2. Mt. Gox's internal auditing and accounting practices [24327] 3. Mt. Gox's cold storage security measures [24332] 4. Mt. Gox's customer service and response to security breaches [122261]
Responsible Organization 1. Mt. Gox - The software failure incident was primarily caused by Mt. Gox, the Bitcoin exchange that faced technological problems, major theft, and issues with its implementation of the bitcoin protocol [24490, 24332, 24531, 24327].
Impacted Organization 1. Mt. Gox [24490, 24332, 24531, 24327] 2. Bitcoin users and investors who held funds on Mt. Gox [24490, 24332, 24531, 24327] 3. Customers of Mt. Gox who had deposited Bitcoins and other cryptocurrencies on the exchange [24490, 24332, 24531, 24327]
Software Causes 1. The software cause of the failure incident at Mt. Gox was related to a flaw in bitcoin known as "transaction malleability," which allowed hackers to alter transaction IDs and manipulate the system to initiate multiple transactions, leading to the loss of funds [Article 24327]. 2. The failure incident also involved a vulnerability in the bitcoin protocol, specifically related to transaction malleability, which was known since 2011 and could be mitigated with proper software implementations to accurately report balances and transactions [Article 24332].
Non-software Causes 1. Lack of proper auditing and accounting practices at Mt. Gox, leading to a failure to conduct audits of customer deposits and a lack of knowledge about the company's financial situation [Article 24327]. 2. Mt. Gox's lax approach to security and internal practices, such as not conducting audits of customer deposits and having only one person knowledgeable about accessing the exchange's cold storage [Article 24327]. 3. Mt. Gox's failure to register with FinCEN and comply with regulatory requirements, leading to issues with banking partners and the freezing of accounts by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security [Article 24327]. 4. Mt. Gox's slow response to customer withdrawals and opaque communication about its financial troubles, leading to a loss of customer trust and a slow-motion bank run [Article 24327].
Impacts 1. The collapse of Mt. Gox, a prominent Bitcoin exchange, led to significant financial losses for users and the company, with reports of theft totaling hundreds of millions of dollars in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies [Article 24332, Article 24531]. 2. The incident raised concerns about the security and reliability of cryptocurrency exchanges, highlighting the vulnerability of such platforms to cyber attacks and theft [Article 122261]. 3. The failure of Mt. Gox had a negative impact on the public perception of Bitcoin and the cryptocurrency industry, potentially setting back the acceptance and adoption of virtual currencies by several years [Article 24332]. 4. The incident also exposed flaws in the implementation of the Bitcoin protocol, particularly related to transaction malleability, which allowed for the manipulation of transaction IDs and subsequent theft of funds [Article 24327]. 5. The collapse of Mt. Gox resulted in the bankruptcy of the exchange, affecting over 127,000 creditors, including both individual users and institutional investors [Article 24531].
Preventions 1. Implementing proper security measures to protect against cyber attacks and hacking attempts, such as regularly updating software, conducting security audits, and using secure encryption protocols [Article 24332, Article 122261]. 2. Ensuring proper auditing and monitoring of accounts and transactions to detect any anomalies or discrepancies in a timely manner [Article 24327]. 3. Educating employees and users about best practices for securing their accounts and wallets, including using strong passwords, enabling two-factor authentication, and avoiding sharing sensitive information [Article 122261]. 4. Implementing industry best practices for handling customer funds, such as maintaining adequate reserves, conducting regular audits, and following regulatory guidelines [Article 24332]. 5. Collaborating with regulatory authorities and industry organizations to establish standards and guidelines for the safe operation of cryptocurrency exchanges and wallets [Article 24531].
Fixes 1. Implementing software solutions to address the known issue of transaction malleability in Bitcoin, which was a key factor in the Mt. Gox collapse [Article 24327]. 2. Enhancing auditing practices and financial management within cryptocurrency exchanges to prevent operational failures and ensure the security of customer funds [Article 24327]. 3. Strengthening security measures, such as using cold wallets for storage and improving account protection, to safeguard against hacks and thefts in the cryptocurrency ecosystem [Article 122261].
References 1. Mt. Gox exchange [Article 24490, Article 24332, Article 24531, Article 24327] 2. Bitcoin Foundation [Article 24332, Article 24327] 3. SecondMarket [Article 24490] 4. Various Bitcoin companies like Coinbase, Circle, Blockchain.info, and Payward [Article 24490] 5. US federal prosecutors [Article 24531] 6. Ribbit Capital [Article 24531] 7. BitMart exchange [Article 122261] 8. Canadian police [Article 122261] 9. CipherTrace [Article 122261] 10. Coinbase exchange [Article 122261]

Software Taxonomy of Faults

Category Option Rationale
Recurring one_organization, multiple_organization (a) The software failure incident having happened again at one_organization: - Mt. Gox, a Japanese exchange, faced a significant software failure incident in 2014 when cybercriminals stole $450 million in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, leading to the exchange being forced into bankruptcy [Article 122261]. - Mt. Gox had also experienced problems earlier, such as suspending withdrawals in US dollars for two weeks in the summer of 2013, causing concerns about its technology and safety [Article 24327]. (b) The software failure incident having happened again at multiple_organization: - Other cryptocurrency exchanges have also been targeted by hackers, with one of the biggest heists occurring in August when cybercriminals stole $610 million in various cryptocurrencies from the Chinese platform Poly Network [Article 122261]. - Losses from crypto hacks, thefts, fraud, and misappropriation totaled $681 million in the first seven months of a year, indicating that multiple organizations in the cryptocurrency space have faced similar software failure incidents [Article 122261].
Phase (Design/Operation) design, operation (a) In the case of Mt. Gox, the software failure incident can be attributed to design-related factors introduced during system development and updates. The incident involved a flaw in the Bitcoin protocol known as "transaction malleability," which allowed hackers to manipulate transaction IDs and exploit the system [Article 24327]. This flaw was known since 2011, and proper software implementation could have mitigated its impact. Additionally, Mt. Gox's lax approach to auditing its accounts and handling financial troubles contributed to the software failure incident [Article 24327]. (b) The software failure incident at Mt. Gox also involved operational factors related to the misuse and operation of the system. The exchange faced challenges with withdrawals, both in US dollars and bitcoins, leading to customer dissatisfaction and a slow-motion bank run [Article 24327]. Furthermore, the company's failure to conduct audits of customer deposits and the discovery of financial insolvency highlighted operational weaknesses in how Mt. Gox managed its operations [Article 24327].
Boundary (Internal/External) within_system, outside_system (a) The software failure incident related to the collapse of Mt. Gox was primarily within the system. The incident involved a flaw in the bitcoin protocol known as "transaction malleability," which allowed hackers to manipulate transaction IDs and exploit the system [Article 24327]. Additionally, Mt. Gox's internal practices, such as lax accounting and operating without enough funds to pay every depositor, contributed to the failure [Article 24327]. (b) However, external factors also played a role in the software failure incident. Mt. Gox faced regulatory challenges and cyber attacks from outside sources, including disruptive cyber attacks that overwhelmed exchanges and forced them to suspend withdrawals [Article 24531]. The exchange also had to deal with issues related to US money-laundering regulations and banking partnerships, which affected its operations [Article 24332].
Nature (Human/Non-human) non-human_actions, human_actions (a) The software failure incident occurring due to non-human actions: - The collapse of Mt. Gox was primarily attributed to a flaw in bitcoin known as "transaction malleability," which allowed hackers to alter transaction IDs and exploit the system without human participation [Article 24327]. - The theft of funds from crypto exchanges like BitMart and Poly Network were results of cybercriminal activities and security breaches, indicating failures due to non-human actions [Article 122261]. (b) The software failure incident occurring due to human actions: - Mt. Gox's troubles were compounded by serious lapses in how the company audited its accounts and handled financial trouble, indicating failures introduced by human actions [Article 24327]. - The collapse of Mt. Gox was also linked to the company's lax approach to accounting, lack of audits on customer deposits, and poor management practices, all of which were human actions contributing to the failure [Article 24327].
Dimension (Hardware/Software) hardware, software (a) The software failure incident occurring due to hardware: - The collapse of Mt. Gox in 2014 was primarily attributed to a vulnerability in the bitcoin protocol known as "transaction malleability," which allowed hackers to manipulate transaction IDs and exploit the system [Article 24327]. - Mt. Gox faced issues with its computer system, leading to the loss of a significant amount of bitcoins due to hacking into its faulty hardware [Article 24531]. (b) The software failure incident occurring due to software: - Mt. Gox's troubles were exacerbated by serious lapses in how the company audited its accounts and how it dealt with financial trouble, indicating software-related issues in auditing and financial management [Article 24327]. - The collapse of Mt. Gox was also linked to software issues such as the failure to address the known vulnerability of transaction malleability and the lack of proper software solutions to prevent theft [Article 24327]. - The incident at Mt. Gox highlighted the need for responsible software preparation to handle possibilities like transaction malleability, emphasizing the importance of software security in dealing with bitcoin transactions [Article 24332].
Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) malicious, non-malicious (a) In the case of Mt. Gox, the software failure incident was primarily non-malicious. The failure was attributed to a flaw in the bitcoin protocol known as "transaction malleability," which allowed for the theft of a significant amount of bitcoins from the exchange's "cold storage" wallet [Article 24327]. The incident involved serious lapses in how the company audited its accounts and how it handled the discovery of financial trouble, rather than being a deliberate act of harm towards the system [Article 24327]. However, there were also elements of malicious intent in other cryptocurrency-related software failure incidents. For example, cybercriminals targeted crypto exchanges for theft, such as the case of the Chinese platform Poly Network where $610 million was stolen [Article 122261]. Additionally, individuals holding large amounts of crypto were targeted for theft through tactics like SIM-swap attacks, indicating malicious intent to steal funds [Article 122261].
Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) poor_decisions, accidental_decisions (a) poor_decisions: - Mt. Gox's troubles were compounded by a flaw in bitcoin known as "transaction malleability," which had been known since 2011 but was not adequately addressed by the company [Article 24327]. - Mt. Gox's lax approach to accounting, including allegedly never conducting an audit of customer deposits, and the lack of knowledge within the company about the extent of the storage leak, indicate poor decision-making in managing the company's financial operations [Article 24327]. - Mt. Gox's failure to properly address the transaction malleability issue, coupled with serious lapses in auditing accounts and handling financial trouble, contributed to the collapse of the exchange [Article 24327]. (b) accidental_decisions: - The theft of funds from Mt. Gox was a result of a vulnerability in the bitcoin protocol known as "transaction malleability," which allowed hackers to alter transaction IDs and exploit the system [Article 24327]. - The theft of funds from Mt. Gox was facilitated by a flaw in bitcoin itself, compounded by the company's implementation of the protocol and internal practices, leading to a situation where attackers could manipulate the system without detection [Article 24327]. - The theft of funds from Mt. Gox was a result of cybercriminals exploiting the transaction malleability issue, which was a known flaw in bitcoin but was not effectively mitigated by the company [Article 24327].
Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) development_incompetence (a) The software failure incident occurring due to development incompetence: - Mt. Gox's troubles were compounded by a flaw in bitcoin known as "transaction malleability," which had been known since 2011 and could have been mitigated with proper software implementation [Article 24327]. - Mt. Gox allegedly never conducted an audit of its customer deposits, and there were serious lapses in how the company audited its accounts, leading to a situation where a thief could exploit the system without the company realizing it [Article 24327]. (b) The software failure incident occurring accidentally: - The issue of transaction malleability in bitcoin, which contributed to Mt. Gox's troubles, was a flaw in the bitcoin protocol itself and not directly Mt. Gox's fault [Article 24327]. - The hackers exploited a process used by some bitcoin exchanges that introduced "malleability" into the code governing transactions, allowing them to manipulate transactions and slow down the exchanges [Article 24531].
Duration temporary The software failure incident related to the collapse of Mt. Gox was a temporary failure due to contributing factors introduced by certain circumstances but not all. The incident involved a flaw in the bitcoin protocol known as "transaction malleability" that allowed hackers to manipulate transaction IDs, leading to the loss of significant amounts of bitcoins [Article 24327]. Additionally, the company's lax approach to accounting, failure to conduct audits of customer deposits, and discovery of financial trouble contributed to the temporary failure [Article 24327]. However, the incident was also influenced by the broader challenges faced by the bitcoin community in reconciling freewheeling, libertarian ideals with the rigorous regulation required in financial services, as well as customers' needs for reliable service [Article 24531]. This indicates that while specific circumstances and internal factors played a significant role in the temporary failure, external regulatory and industry challenges also contributed to the overall software failure incident.
Behaviour crash, omission, value, other (a) crash: Mt. Gox experienced a significant software failure incident that led to its collapse and bankruptcy. The exchange faced a situation where it lost a large amount of Bitcoin due to theft, leading to the company being unable to fulfill customer withdrawals and ultimately shutting down [24490]. (b) omission: The software failure incident at Mt. Gox involved the omission of performing its intended functions related to safeguarding customer deposits and managing transactions securely. The exchange failed to conduct audits of customer deposits, leading to a situation where the company did not have enough funds to pay back all depositors [24327]. (c) timing: The timing of the software failure incident at Mt. Gox can be seen in the delays and issues with withdrawals experienced by customers. The exchange suspended both US dollar and Bitcoin withdrawals, causing concerns among users and leading to a slow-motion bank run as customers started pulling out their funds [24327]. (d) value: The software failure incident at Mt. Gox resulted in the system performing its intended functions incorrectly, particularly in terms of managing customer deposits and ensuring the security of transactions. The exchange faced a situation where it had a discrepancy in its bank accounts and did not have the necessary funds to cover all customer deposits [24327, 24531]. (e) byzantine: The software failure incident at Mt. Gox did not exhibit behaviors of a byzantine failure, which involves inconsistent responses and interactions. The primary issue in this case was related to theft, mismanagement, and security vulnerabilities rather than erratic or inconsistent system behavior [24327, 24531]. (f) other: The software failure incident at Mt. Gox also involved issues related to transaction malleability in the Bitcoin protocol, which allowed for the manipulation of transaction IDs and led to problems with tracking and verifying transactions. This flaw in the protocol contributed to the overall failure of the exchange [24327].

IoT System Layer

Layer Option Rationale
Perception None None
Communication None None
Application None None

Other Details

Category Option Rationale
Consequence property, theoretical_consequence (d) property: People's material goods, money, or data was impacted due to the software failure In the reported software failure incident involving Mt. Gox, a major Bitcoin exchange, customers suffered significant financial losses due to a theft of 744,000 Bitcoins, which was about 6% of all Bitcoins in circulation at the time [24490]. The incident led to the exchange's bankruptcy filing and raised questions about the security of digital currency exchanges [24332]. Additionally, the collapse of Mt. Gox resulted in the loss of $450 million in Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, impacting both the exchange and its users [122261].
Domain finance (a) The failed system was related to the finance industry, specifically the Bitcoin exchange market, as seen in articles [24490], [24332], [24531], and [24327]. Mt. Gox, the prominent Bitcoin exchange that collapsed, was a key player in the Bitcoin market, facilitating the buying and selling of Bitcoins for various currencies. (b) The failed system was not related to the transportation industry. (c) The failed system was not related to the natural resources industry. (d) The failed system was not related to the sales industry. (e) The failed system was not related to the construction industry. (f) The failed system was not related to the manufacturing industry. (g) The failed system was not related to the utilities industry. (h) The failed system was related to the finance industry, specifically the Bitcoin exchange market, as detailed in the articles. (i) The failed system was not related to the knowledge industry. (j) The failed system was not related to the health industry. (k) The failed system was not related to the entertainment industry. (l) The failed system was not related to the government industry. (m) The failed system was not related to any of the specified industries.

Sources

Back to List