Recurring |
one_organization, multiple_organization |
(a) The software failure incident related to zero-click attacks on Apple's iMessage service has happened again within the same organization. Despite Apple's efforts to address the vulnerabilities, new zero-click attacks continue to emerge, as highlighted in the recent findings by Citizen Lab and Amnesty International [117430]. The incident shows that Apple's measures, such as BlastDoor, have not fully succeeded in preventing these sophisticated attacks. Apple is working on further hardening iMessage security beyond BlastDoor, with new defenses expected to be introduced in iOS 15 [117430].
(b) The software failure incident related to zero-click attacks on messaging services is not limited to Apple's iMessage alone. The articles mention that zero-click attacks also occur in other communication apps like WhatsApp, indicating that similar incidents have happened at other organizations with their products and services [117430]. This broader issue suggests that the challenge of addressing zero-click attacks extends beyond a single organization and affects multiple platforms. |
Phase (Design/Operation) |
design, operation |
(a) The article discusses a software failure incident related to the design phase, specifically focusing on the vulnerabilities and weaknesses in Apple's iMessage service that have been exploited by attackers. The incident involves zero-click attacks targeting high-profile individuals, indicating that the system development and updates have introduced contributing factors that allow for such attacks to take place [117430].
(b) The article also touches upon the operation phase of the software failure incident, highlighting how attackers can exploit these vulnerabilities in iMessage to target specific individuals. This aspect relates to the misuse of the system by attackers who take advantage of the flaws in the design and operation of iMessage to execute sophisticated attacks [117430]. |
Boundary (Internal/External) |
within_system, outside_system |
The software failure incident discussed in the articles is related to the boundary of the system, involving contributing factors both within and outside the system.
1. Within_system: The failure is attributed to vulnerabilities within Apple's iMessage service, particularly related to zero-click attacks exploiting weaknesses in iMessage. Apple has attempted to address these vulnerabilities through features like BlastDoor, but sophisticated attacks like "Megalodon" and "ForcedEntry" have still been able to defeat these defenses [117430].
2. Outside_system: The incident also involves external factors such as the sophisticated malware deployed by the Bahraini government against human rights activists. This external malware targeted vulnerabilities within the iMessage service to execute zero-click attacks, highlighting the external threats that can impact the security of the system [117430]. |
Nature (Human/Non-human) |
non-human_actions |
(a) The software failure incident occurring due to non-human actions:
The software failure incident discussed in the articles is related to zero-click attacks targeting Apple's iMessage service. These attacks can happen without any interaction from the victim, such as clicking on links or granting permissions. The malware deployed against human rights activists in Bahrain required no interaction from the victims to take hold on their iPhones, highlighting a vulnerability in the iMessage service [117430].
(b) The software failure incident occurring due to human actions:
The articles do not specifically mention any software failure incident caused by contributing factors introduced by human actions. |
Dimension (Hardware/Software) |
software |
(a) The software failure incident related to hardware:
- The article does not mention any software failure incident related to hardware [117430].
(b) The software failure incident related to software:
- The article discusses a software failure incident related to software vulnerabilities in Apple's iMessage service, specifically zero-click attacks exploiting weaknesses in iMessage to deploy sophisticated malware against high-profile targets [117430]. |
Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) |
malicious, non-malicious |
(a) The software failure incident described in the articles is malicious in nature. The incident involves the Bahraini government allegedly purchasing and deploying sophisticated malware against human rights activists, including spyware that required no interaction from the victim to take hold on their iPhones. These "zero-click" attacks targeted high-profile individuals and were used to exploit vulnerabilities in Apple's iMessage service [117430]. The attacks were highly sophisticated, costly to develop, and specifically aimed at targeting specific individuals, indicating a malicious intent to harm the system.
(b) The software failure incident is also non-malicious in the sense that it highlights vulnerabilities and flaws in Apple's iMessage service that could be exploited by attackers. The incident reveals weaknesses in the iMessage platform, such as the ability for zero-click attacks to defeat security measures like BlastDoor, despite Apple's efforts to address these issues in iOS updates [117430]. The incident underscores the challenges of securing a complex messaging platform like iMessage, which has a large attack surface due to its numerous features and integrations with other parts of iOS. |
Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) |
poor_decisions |
(a) The intent of the software failure incident related to poor decisions is evident in the software failure incident reported in Article 117430. The incident involves the Bahraini government allegedly purchasing and deploying sophisticated malware against human rights activists, including spyware that required no interaction from the victim to take hold on their iPhones. Despite efforts by Apple to address the issue with features like BlastDoor, interactionless attacks continue to occur, indicating that the decisions made in the design and implementation of iMessage may have contributed to the vulnerability exploited by attackers [117430]. |
Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) |
unknown |
(a) The articles do not provide information about a software failure incident related to development incompetence.
(b) The software failure incident discussed in the articles is related to sophisticated malware attacks, specifically zero-click attacks targeting Apple's iMessage service. These attacks are not accidental but are intentionally developed and deployed by attackers to exploit vulnerabilities in the iMessage platform [117430]. |
Duration |
temporary |
The software failure incident discussed in the articles is more temporary rather than permanent. The incident involves zero-click attacks targeting Apple's iMessage service, specifically exploiting vulnerabilities in iOS to execute these attacks. Security researchers have identified specific vulnerabilities like "Megalodon" and "ForcedEntry" that have not been fully addressed by Apple despite efforts like BlastDoor in iOS 14. Apple is working on new defenses for iMessage security in iOS 15, indicating a temporary nature of the failure incident as the company continues to address and improve the security of its messaging platform [117430]. |
Behaviour |
byzantine |
(a) crash: The articles do not mention any specific incidents of system crashes where the system loses state and does not perform any of its intended functions.
(b) omission: The articles do not mention any specific incidents of system omissions where the system omits to perform its intended functions at an instance(s).
(c) timing: The articles do not mention any specific incidents of timing failures where the system performs its intended functions correctly, but too late or too early.
(d) value: The articles do not mention any specific incidents of value failures where the system performs its intended functions incorrectly.
(e) byzantine: The behavior described in the articles aligns more closely with a byzantine failure, where the system behaves erroneously with inconsistent responses and interactions. The sophisticated malware attacks discussed in the articles, such as zero-click attacks on iMessage, demonstrate a level of sophistication and inconsistency in the system's responses, indicating a form of byzantine behavior [117430].
(f) other: The behavior described in the articles does not fit into the categories of crash, omission, timing, or value. The other behavior observed in the articles is related to the complexity and vulnerabilities of the iMessage system, which creates opportunities for attackers to exploit flaws in the system's features and interconnections, leading to sophisticated attacks like zero-click exploits [117430]. |