Recurring |
unknown |
<Article 131291> does not provide information about a software failure incident happening again at either one_organization or multiple_organization. Therefore, the answer to this question is 'unknown'. |
Phase (Design/Operation) |
design |
Unknown |
Boundary (Internal/External) |
within_system, outside_system |
(a) within_system: The software failure incident in this case seems to be primarily within the system. The data breach and theft of classified military documents, including blueprints of weapons used by Nato allies, originated from within the system of MBDA Missile Systems. The breach involved hackers stealing data linked to the major European weapons maker, MBDA, from a compromised external hard drive. The stolen data included detailed drawings of MBDA equipment and classified information about employees and closed military projects [131291].
(b) outside_system: The incident also involved external factors contributing to the failure. Cyber criminals, operating on Russian and English forums, were selling the stolen data online for Bitcoins. The hackers claimed to have sold the data to at least one unknown buyer. Additionally, the breach took place in Italy, and investigations were centered around one of MBDA's suppliers, indicating external elements playing a role in the software failure incident [131291]. |
Nature (Human/Non-human) |
non-human_actions, human_actions |
(a) The software failure incident in this case appears to be primarily due to non-human actions, specifically a data breach carried out by criminal hackers who stole data linked to a major European weapons maker, MBDA Missile Systems. The hackers were able to access and steal classified military documents, including blueprints of weapons used by Nato allies in the Ukraine war, from a compromised external hard drive. This breach led to the exposure of sensitive information, such as detailed drawings of MBDA equipment and classified NATO documents, which were then put up for sale on online forums [131291].
(b) While the initial breach and exposure of data were non-human actions, there is also a human action component involved in this incident. The fact that the data breach occurred due to criminal hackers exploiting vulnerabilities in the system indicates that there may have been human errors or oversights in the cybersecurity measures implemented by MBDA Missile Systems or its suppliers. Additionally, the response to the breach, including investigations and cooperation with authorities, involves human actions taken by the company and relevant stakeholders to address the aftermath of the software failure incident [131291]. |
Dimension (Hardware/Software) |
hardware, software |
(a) The software failure incident occurring due to hardware:
- The data breach at MBDA Missile Systems was attributed to a compromised external hard drive, indicating a hardware-related vulnerability [131291].
(b) The software failure incident occurring due to software:
- The data breach and theft of classified military documents were a result of criminal hackers exploiting software vulnerabilities to access and steal sensitive information from MBDA Missile Systems [131291]. |
Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) |
malicious |
The software failure incident reported in the provided article [131291] is classified as a malicious failure. Criminal hackers were able to breach the data of MBDA Missile Systems, a major European weapons maker, and sell classified military documents online, including blueprints of weapons used by Nato allies in the Ukraine war. The hackers claimed to have "classified information about employees of companies that took part in the development of closed military projects" and provided documents labeled as "NATO CONFIDENTIAL", "NATO RESTRICTED", and "NATO SECRET" [131291]. This breach was a deliberate act by the hackers to steal sensitive information and sell it for financial gain, indicating a malicious intent to harm the system and compromise security. |
Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) |
unknown |
Unknown |
Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) |
unknown |
The articles do not provide information related to a software failure incident occurring due to development incompetence or accidentally. |
Duration |
unknown |
The articles do not provide information about a software failure incident being either permanent or temporary. |
Behaviour |
unknown |
(a) crash: The software failure incident in this case does not involve a crash where the system loses state and does not perform any of its intended functions. The incident is more focused on a data breach and theft of classified military documents rather than a system crash [131291].
(b) omission: The software failure incident does not involve the system omitting to perform its intended functions at an instance(s). The focus of the incident is on the theft and sale of classified data rather than the system failing to perform its functions [131291].
(c) timing: The software failure incident is not related to the system performing its intended functions correctly but too late or too early. The incident revolves around the data breach and theft of classified military documents rather than timing issues [131291].
(d) value: The software failure incident does not involve the system performing its intended functions incorrectly. The main issue in this incident is the theft and sale of classified military data rather than the system malfunctioning in its functions [131291].
(e) byzantine: The software failure incident does not exhibit the behavior of the system behaving erroneously with inconsistent responses and interactions. The incident primarily involves a data breach and theft of classified military documents rather than erratic system behavior [131291].
(f) other: The software failure incident in this case does not fall under the categories of crash, omission, timing, value, or byzantine behaviors. The primary issue is the unauthorized access, theft, and sale of classified military data rather than a specific software failure behavior [131291]. |