Recurring |
unknown |
(a) The software failure incident of the Voyager 1 spacecraft sending garbled telemetry data due to the attitude articulation and control system (AACS) sending data through a non-functional onboard computer has not been explicitly mentioned to have happened again within the same organization (NASA) or with its products and services [131807].
(b) The article does not provide information about a similar incident happening at other organizations or with their products and services [131807]. |
Phase (Design/Operation) |
design |
(a) The software failure incident in Article #131807 was related to the design phase. The glitch in the Voyager 1 spacecraft's data telemetry was traced back to the attitude articulation and control system (AACS) sending data through an onboard computer that had stopped working years ago, corrupting the information. This issue was identified as a result of the system design where the AACS was incorrectly sending data through the non-functional computer, leading to the glitch [131807].
(b) There is no specific information in Article #131807 indicating that the software failure incident was related to the operation phase. |
Boundary (Internal/External) |
within_system |
(a) within_system: The software failure incident with the Voyager 1 spacecraft was due to a glitch originating from within the system itself. Specifically, the glitch was traced back to the attitude articulation and control system (AACS) sending telemetry data through an onboard computer that had stopped working years ago, causing corruption of the information [131807]. This indicates that the failure was internal to the spacecraft's systems. |
Nature (Human/Non-human) |
non-human_actions |
(a) The software failure incident in the Voyager 1 spacecraft was due to non-human actions. The glitch was traced back to the attitude articulation and control system (AACS) sending telemetry data through an onboard computer that had stopped working years ago, leading to the corruption of information. This issue was not caused by human actions but rather by the system itself operating in an unexpected manner [131807]. |
Dimension (Hardware/Software) |
software |
(a) The software failure incident in the Voyager 1 spacecraft was not directly caused by hardware issues. The glitch was traced back to the attitude articulation and control system (AACS) sending telemetry data through an onboard computer that had stopped working years ago, corrupting the information. This indicates that the hardware itself was not the root cause of the failure, but rather the software configuration that led to data corruption [131807]. |
Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) |
non-malicious |
(a) The software failure incident described in Article #131807 is non-malicious. The glitch in the Voyager 1 spacecraft's data telemetry was traced back to the attitude articulation and control system (AACS) sending data through an onboard computer that had stopped working years ago, causing corruption of information. The fix involved instructing the AACS to switch back to the correct computer for sending data. The article mentions that engineers are unsure of the root cause of the glitch but suspect that another computer sending a faulty command could be the reason [131807]. |
Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) |
unknown |
The software failure incident related to the Voyager 1 spacecraft's data glitch does not indicate any poor decisions or accidental decisions as contributing factors. The glitch was attributed to the AACS sending telemetry data through an onboard computer that had stopped working years ago, which corrupted the information. The fix involved instructing the AACS to switch back to the correct computer for sending data. The article does not mention any poor or accidental decisions leading to the software failure incident [131807]. |
Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) |
accidental |
(a) The software failure incident in Article #131807 does not seem to be related to development incompetence. The glitch in the Voyager 1 spacecraft's data telemetry was traced back to the attitude articulation and control system (AACS) sending data through an onboard computer that was known to have stopped working years ago. The fix involved instructing the AACS to switch back to the correct computer for sending data. The team at NASA JPL successfully diagnosed and resolved the issue, indicating a level of professional competence in addressing the problem [131807].
(b) The software failure incident in Article #131807 appears to be accidental in nature. The glitch in the Voyager 1 spacecraft's telemetry data transmission was caused by the AACS sending data through an onboard computer that had ceased functioning years ago. This accidental routing of data through the defunct computer corrupted the information being sent back to Earth. The team at NASA JPL identified the source of the glitch and implemented a solution to rectify the issue, indicating that the incident was not intentional but rather a result of an accidental configuration or error [131807]. |
Duration |
temporary |
The software failure incident related to the Voyager 1 spacecraft's data glitch was temporary. The glitch was traced back to the attitude articulation and control system (AACS) sending telemetry data through an onboard computer that had stopped working years ago, corrupting the information. The fix involved instructing the AACS to switch back to the correct computer for sending data. Engineers are still investigating the root cause of the glitch, suggesting that it was due to contributing factors introduced by certain circumstances but not all [131807]. |
Behaviour |
crash, other |
(a) crash: The software failure incident related to the Voyager 1 spacecraft involved a crash where the system lost its state and was not performing its intended functions. The glitch caused the spacecraft's attitude articulation and control system (AACS) to send back garbled telemetry data through an onboard computer that had stopped working years ago, corrupting the information [131807].
(b) omission: There is no specific mention of the software failure incident being related to omission in the provided article.
(c) timing: The software failure incident did not involve timing issues where the system performed its intended functions too late or too early.
(d) value: The software failure incident did not involve the system performing its intended functions incorrectly.
(e) byzantine: The software failure incident did not involve the system behaving erroneously with inconsistent responses and interactions.
(f) other: The software failure incident involved the system sending telemetry data through an onboard computer that had stopped working, leading to corrupted information. This behavior could be categorized as an "other" type of failure where the system behaved in an unexpected manner [131807]. |