Incident: Inadequate PDF Redaction Tools Expose Sensitive Information, Impacting Security

Published Date: 2022-11-25

Postmortem Analysis
Timeline 1. The software failure incident mentioned in the article happened in November 2022.
System 1. PDFzorro and PDFescape Online redaction tools [134827]
Responsible Organization 1. Popular redaction tools such as PDFzorro and PDFescape Online were responsible for causing the software failure incident by allowing full access to text that had allegedly been redacted [134827].
Impacted Organization 1. US court system 2. US Office of the Inspector General 3. Freedom of Information Act requests [Cited from Article 134827]
Software Causes 1. The failure incident was caused by flaws in popular redaction tools for PDF documents, specifically PDFzorro and PDFescape Online, which allowed full access to text that had allegedly been redacted, making the text accessible by copying and pasting it [134827].
Non-software Causes 1. Human error in the redaction process, leading to improper redaction of sensitive information [134827]. 2. Technical failings in the redaction tools, allowing for easy access to supposedly redacted text [134827].
Impacts 1. The software failure incident led to the exposure of thousands of documents with improperly redacted information, including people's names and other sensitive details, potentially compromising individuals' safety and national security [134827]. 2. The incident highlighted the vulnerabilities in popular redaction tools like PDFzorro and PDFescape Online, which allowed full access to supposedly redacted text, posing a significant risk to data security [134827]. 3. Researchers demonstrated a new attack method using hidden fingerprints to reveal redacted names, showcasing the potential for sensitive information leakage even after redaction attempts [134827]. 4. The failure to properly redact documents has historical precedents, such as the exposure of Edward Snowden as a target of US spying due to redaction failures, emphasizing the long-standing challenges in securely redacting sensitive information [134827].
Preventions 1. Implementing proper security measures in redaction tools to ensure that redacted text is truly inaccessible, such as encryption or secure deletion [134827]. 2. Conducting thorough testing and security audits of redaction tools to identify and address vulnerabilities before they can be exploited [134827]. 3. Following best practices for redacting documents, such as changing the content of the original document before redacting the resulting PDF, as recommended by the NSA [134827].
Fixes 1. Implementing security fixes and reworking the redaction tool to be fully compliant, as mentioned by a customer service representative from PDFescape Online [134827]. 2. Following the NSA's guidelines for redacting documents, which recommend changing the content of the original document before redacting the resulting PDF, such as changing names to rows of "x" characters or the word "redacted" [134827].
References 1. University of Illinois research team - Maxwell Bland, Anushya Iyer, Kirill Levchenko [134827] 2. US court system 3. US Office of the Inspector General 4. Freedom of Information Act requests 5. PDFzorro 6. PDFescape Online 7. Microsoft 8. Daniel Lopresti, professor of computer science at Lehigh University 9. US Department of Justice 10. Adobe 11. Mike Lissner, executive director of the Free Law Project

Software Taxonomy of Faults

Category Option Rationale
Recurring one_organization, multiple_organization (a) The software failure incident related to redaction flaws in PDF documents has happened again at the US court system, the US Office of the Inspector General, and Freedom of Information Act requests [134827]. The incident involved thousands of documents that exposed people's names and other sensitive details due to ineffective redaction methods. (b) The software failure incident involving redaction flaws in PDF documents has also occurred at other organizations besides the US court system and the US Office of the Inspector General. The research highlighted failures in popular redaction tools like PDFzorro and PDFescape Online, indicating a broader issue across various organizations that rely on these tools for redacting sensitive information [134827].
Phase (Design/Operation) design, operation (a) The software failure incident related to the design phase can be seen in the case of redaction tools for PDF documents. The research conducted by a team at the University of Illinois highlighted significant flaws in popular redaction tools like PDFzorro and PDFescape Online. These tools offered no protection to the underlying text at all, allowing easy access to redacted text by copying and pasting it. The flaws in these tools were identified during the research, leading to the registration of CVE numbers for the vulnerabilities [134827]. (b) The software failure incident related to the operation phase can be observed in the real-world impact of redaction failures on organizations like the US Department of Justice, the US courts system, the Office of Inspector General, and Adobe. Despite the vulnerabilities identified in popular redaction tools and the potential risks associated with improper redaction, many organizations impacted by redaction failures did not respond to requests for comment. This lack of response indicates a gap in addressing operational issues related to redaction failures and securing sensitive information [134827].
Boundary (Internal/External) within_system (a) within_system: The software failure incident discussed in the article is primarily within the system. The failure occurred due to flaws in popular redaction tools for PDF documents, such as PDFzorro and PDFescape Online, which allowed full access to text that had allegedly been redacted [134827]. The incident involved vulnerabilities within the software itself, leading to the exposure of sensitive information despite redaction attempts.
Nature (Human/Non-human) non-human_actions, human_actions (a) The software failure incident in the articles is related to non-human_actions, specifically flaws in redaction tools that allowed for the extraction of supposedly redacted text without human intervention. The research found that popular tools like PDFzorro and PDFescape Online offered no protection to the underlying text, allowing for easy access to redacted information through copy and paste [134827]. (b) The software failure incident can also be attributed to human_actions, as the redaction failures were a result of incorrect redaction practices by individuals and organizations. The article mentions instances where redactions were done incorrectly, exposing sensitive information and potentially compromising people's safety and national security [134827].
Dimension (Hardware/Software) software (a) The articles do not mention any software failure incident occurring due to contributing factors originating in hardware. Hence, there is no information available regarding a software failure incident related to hardware [134827]. (b) The software failure incident discussed in the articles is related to software flaws in popular tools for redacting PDF documents. The research conducted by the team at the University of Illinois identified that two popular tools, PDFzorro and PDFescape Online, offered no protection to the underlying text in redacted documents, allowing easy access to the redacted text by copying and pasting it. Additionally, the research team developed a tool called Edact-Ray that could reveal names that had been redacted by analyzing the size of glyphs and their positioning in the document. This incident highlights a software failure due to flaws in the redaction software [134827].
Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) malicious (a) The software failure incident discussed in the article is related to a malicious objective. The failure occurred due to flaws in popular redaction tools for PDF documents, which allowed for the extraction of supposedly redacted text, potentially exposing sensitive information and compromising people's safety and national security [134827]. The incident involved a new attack method that could reveal names that had been redacted, demonstrating a deliberate attempt to bypass redaction measures and extract hidden information [134827].
Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) poor_decisions (a) The intent of the software failure incident: The software failure incident discussed in the article was primarily due to poor decisions made in the design and implementation of redaction tools for PDF documents. The research conducted by the team at the University of Illinois revealed that popular tools like PDFzorro and PDFescape Online offered no protection to the underlying text in redacted documents, allowing easy access to the supposedly hidden information by simply copying and pasting it [134827]. The failure to properly redact sensitive information in documents, which could have serious implications for individuals' safety and national security, was a result of inadequate security measures and flawed design choices in the redaction tools. This highlights a case of software failure stemming from poor decisions made during the development and deployment of the tools.
Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) development_incompetence (a) The software failure incident related to development incompetence is evident in the case of redaction tools like PDFzorro and PDFescape Online. Researchers found that these popular tools for redacting PDF documents offered no protection to the underlying text at all, allowing the text to be accessed by copying and pasting it [134827]. (b) The software failure incident related to accidental factors is demonstrated by the unintentional exposure of sensitive information in redacted documents due to flaws in the redaction process. The failure to properly secure sensitive information in digital documents, leading to leaks of redacted information, can be attributed to accidental technical failings [134827].
Duration temporary The software failure incident discussed in the articles is more aligned with a temporary failure rather than a permanent one. The incident involves vulnerabilities in popular redaction tools for PDF documents, such as PDFzorro and PDFescape Online, that allow full access to redacted text if not used correctly. The incident highlights specific circumstances, such as improper redaction techniques and flaws in the software, contributing to the failure rather than a failure introduced by all circumstances [134827].
Behaviour omission, value, other (a) crash: The articles do not mention any software failure incident related to a crash. (b) omission: The software failure incident described in the articles is related to omission. Specifically, the failure occurred due to the system omitting to properly redact sensitive information in PDF documents, leading to exposed names and other details [134827]. (c) timing: The articles do not mention any software failure incident related to timing issues. (d) value: The software failure incident described in the articles is related to value. The failure occurred due to the system incorrectly redacting sensitive information in PDF documents, allowing access to the underlying text by copying and pasting it [134827]. (e) byzantine: The articles do not mention any software failure incident related to a byzantine behavior. (f) other: The software failure incident described in the articles can be categorized as an omission and a value failure. The system failed to properly redact sensitive information in PDF documents, leading to exposure of names and other details due to incorrect redaction methods [134827].

IoT System Layer

Layer Option Rationale
Perception None None
Communication None None
Application None None

Other Details

Category Option Rationale
Consequence property, theoretical_consequence (d) property: People's material goods, money, or data was impacted due to the software failure. The software failure incident discussed in the article pertains to the improper redaction of sensitive information in PDF documents. The consequences of this failure include exposing people's names and other sensitive details due to ineffective redaction tools. The incident led to thousands of documents exposing personal information that should have been redacted, potentially compromising individuals' privacy and security [134827].
Domain government The software failure incident discussed in the article [134827] is related to the government industry. The incident involves the failure of redaction tools used by government officials and courts to securely redact sensitive information in PDF documents. The failure of these tools led to the exposure of people's names and other sensitive details in redacted documents, potentially compromising national security and personal safety. The incident highlights the challenges and risks associated with digital document redaction in the government sector.

Sources

Back to List