Recurring |
one_organization |
(a) The software failure incident related to Tesla's vehicles experiencing issues with tail lights is an example of a recurring issue within the same organization. Tesla had previously recalled nearly 30,000 Model X cars in the United States over a different issue with the front passenger airbag deployment [135315]. This indicates that Tesla has faced software-related problems with its vehicles in the past. |
Phase (Design/Operation) |
design |
(a) The software failure incident related to the design phase is evident in the article. Tesla is recalling over 321,000 vehicles in the United States due to tail lights intermittently failing to illuminate. The issue was identified as an anomaly that may cause false fault detections during the vehicle wake-up process, indicating a design flaw introduced during the development of the system [135315].
(b) The software failure incident related to the operation phase is not explicitly mentioned in the provided article. |
Boundary (Internal/External) |
within_system |
(a) within_system: The software failure incident related to the Tesla vehicles' tail lights not illuminating was attributed to an anomaly within the system. The investigation found that in rare cases, the lights may intermittently not work due to an anomaly that may cause false fault detections during the vehicle wake-up process [135315]. This indicates that the failure originated from within the system itself. |
Nature (Human/Non-human) |
non-human_actions |
(a) The software failure incident related to non-human actions:
The software failure incident with Tesla's vehicles' tail lights was due to an anomaly causing false fault detections during the vehicle wake-up process, leading to the lights intermittently not working. This issue was identified through customer complaints and resulted in the recall of over 321,000 vehicles in the United States. Tesla mentioned that it will deploy an over-the-air update to correct the rear light problem and stated that there were no reports of crashes or injuries related to this specific recall [135315].
(b) The software failure incident related to human actions:
There is no specific mention in the article of the software failure incident being directly caused by human actions. |
Dimension (Hardware/Software) |
hardware |
(a) The software failure incident related to hardware:
- The article mentions that Tesla is recalling more than 321,000 vehicles in the United States because tail lights may intermittently fail to illuminate [135315].
- The investigation found that in rare cases, the lights may intermittently not work due to an anomaly that may cause false fault detections during the vehicle wake-up process [135315].
(b) The software failure incident related to software:
- Tesla stated it will deploy an over-the-air update to correct the rear light issue [135315].
- The article does not specifically mention any software-related contributing factors that originated in software for this particular incident. |
Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) |
non-malicious |
(a) The software failure incident related to the Tesla vehicles' tail lights intermittently failing to illuminate was non-malicious. The issue was attributed to an anomaly causing false fault detections during the vehicle wake-up process, leading to the lights intermittently not working. Tesla mentioned that the recall was initiated following customer complaints and that they had no reports of any crashes or injuries related to the problem [135315]. |
Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) |
unknown |
[a] The software failure incident related to the Tesla vehicle recall for tail lights intermittently failing to illuminate was not attributed to poor decisions but rather to an anomaly causing false fault detections during the vehicle wake-up process. Tesla mentioned that the lights may intermittently not work due to this anomaly, leading to the recall. The company stated that it had no reports of any crashes or injuries related to the recall, indicating that the issue was not a result of poor decisions but rather an unexpected technical problem [135315]. |
Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) |
accidental |
(a) The software failure incident related to development incompetence is not mentioned in the provided article [135315].
(b) The software failure incident related to accidental factors is mentioned in the article [135315]. The article states that the investigation found that in rare cases, the lights may intermittently not work due to an anomaly that may cause false fault detections during the vehicle wake-up process. This indicates that the failure was accidental rather than due to intentional actions or incompetence. |
Duration |
temporary |
The software failure incident related to the Tesla vehicle recall for tail lights not illuminating is described as temporary. The issue was identified as an anomaly that may cause false fault detections during the vehicle wake-up process, leading to the intermittent failure of the lights. Tesla mentioned that it will deploy an over-the-air update to correct the rear light issue, indicating that the failure is not permanent and can be addressed through a software update [135315]. |
Behaviour |
crash, omission, other |
(a) crash: The article mentions that the tail lights of some Tesla vehicles may intermittently fail to illuminate due to an anomaly that may cause false fault detections during the vehicle wake-up process, indicating a failure in the system losing state and not performing its intended functions [135315].
(b) omission: The software failure incident related to the tail lights of Tesla vehicles can be considered as an omission failure since the issue leads to the lights intermittently not working, which means the system is omitting to perform its intended function of illuminating the tail lights [135315].
(c) timing: There is no specific mention of a timing-related failure in the software incident described in the article [135315].
(d) value: The software failure incident does not involve the system performing its intended functions incorrectly, so it is not a value-related failure [135315].
(e) byzantine: The article does not describe the software failure incident as involving inconsistent responses or interactions, so it is not a byzantine-related failure [135315].
(f) other: The behavior of the software failure incident in this case can be categorized as a combination of crash and omission. The system is losing state (crash) during the wake-up process, leading to the omission of the intended function of illuminating the tail lights [135315]. |