Recurring |
one_organization, multiple_organization |
(a) The software failure incident having happened again at one_organization:
- Amazon experienced a similar incident in April 2011 when a networking glitch caused a cascade of problems, leading to the crash of Amazon Web Services and affecting over 70 sites [5256].
- In July 2012, Amazon faced another major failure when a lightning storm caused a power outage at the Amazon Web Services center in Virginia, disrupting services for well-known sites like Netflix, Pinterest, and Instagram [12493].
(b) The software failure incident having happened again at multiple_organization:
- The July 2012 incident involving Amazon Web Services also highlighted the risks faced by businesses and consumers as they increasingly rely on cloud services, impacting various companies beyond just Amazon [12493]. |
Phase (Design/Operation) |
design |
(a) The software failure incidents mentioned in the articles were primarily due to issues related to the design and development phases of the systems. In Article 5256, it is mentioned that Amazon's cloud services crashed due to a networking glitch, which kicked off a cascade of problems. Amazon promised to conduct a detailed post mortem to dig deeply into the root causes of the event [5256]. Similarly, in Article 12493, it is highlighted that a lightning storm caused the power to fail at the Amazon Web Services center in Northern Virginia, leading to a disruption in service. The data center's backup generator also failed for reasons Amazon was still unsure of, indicating a design or development flaw in the backup system [12493]. These incidents point towards failures introduced during the design and development phases of the systems. |
Boundary (Internal/External) |
within_system |
(a) within_system: The software failure incidents reported in the articles were primarily within the system. In both Article 5256 and Article 12493, the failures were attributed to issues within Amazon's cloud computing service, specifically Amazon Web Services (AWS). The incidents were caused by factors such as a networking glitch in Article 5256 and a lightning storm causing power failure and backup generator failure in Article 12493. These internal system issues led to the disruption of services for various websites and companies relying on AWS for data storage and computation [5256, 12493]. |
Nature (Human/Non-human) |
non-human_actions |
(a) The software failure incidents reported in the articles were primarily due to non-human actions. In Article 5256, the failure was attributed to a networking glitch that kicked off a cascade of problems in Amazon's cloud services, affecting over 70 sites [5256]. Similarly, in Article 12493, the failure was caused by a lightning storm that led to a power failure at the Amazon Web Services center in Virginia, impacting well-known sites like Netflix, Pinterest, and Instagram [12493].
(b) There is no specific mention of the software failure incidents being caused by human actions in the articles. |
Dimension (Hardware/Software) |
hardware, unknown |
(a) The software failure incidents reported in the articles were primarily due to hardware issues. In Article 5256, it is mentioned that a networking glitch caused a cascade of problems in Amazon's cloud services, leading to the outage of more than 70 sites, including popular ones like the New York Times, Foursquare, and Reddit. Additionally, in Article 12493, it is highlighted that a lightning storm in Virginia caused the power to fail at an Amazon Web Services center, leading to the disruption of services for well-known sites like Netflix, Pinterest, and Instagram. The failure of the data center's backup generator further exacerbated the situation, emphasizing the hardware-related nature of the incident [5256, 12493].
(b) While hardware issues were the primary contributing factors to the software failure incidents discussed in the articles, there is no explicit mention of software-related factors causing the failures. The incidents were mainly attributed to hardware failures such as networking glitches and power outages at Amazon's data centers, rather than software bugs or faults [unknown]. |
Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) |
non-malicious |
(a) The software failure incidents reported in the articles are non-malicious. In both Article 5256 and Article 12493, the failures were caused by external factors such as a networking glitch and a lightning storm affecting Amazon's cloud computing service. There is no indication in the articles that these incidents were caused by malicious intent or actions by individuals. Instead, they were unforeseen events that led to disruptions in service for various websites and companies relying on Amazon Web Services.
[Cite: Article 5256, Article 12493] |
Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) |
accidental_decisions |
(a) The software failure incidents reported in the articles were not explicitly attributed to poor decisions. However, the incidents were caused by factors such as a networking glitch and a lightning storm that led to power failures at Amazon's cloud computing service centers. These incidents were more accidental in nature rather than being directly linked to poor decisions [5256, 12493]. |
Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) |
accidental |
(a) The software failure incidents reported in the articles were not directly attributed to development incompetence. The failures were mainly due to external factors such as a lightning storm causing power failure at Amazon's data center in Virginia [12493].
(b) The software failure incidents in the articles were accidental in nature. For example, the interruption in Amazon's cloud computing service was caused by a lightning storm that led to power failure at the data center, and the backup generator also failed for reasons Amazon was unsure of [12493]. |
Duration |
temporary |
(a) The software failure incidents described in the articles were temporary. In both incidents, the Amazon Web Services (AWS) experienced disruptions due to external factors such as a networking glitch in one case and a lightning storm causing power failure in another. These incidents led to the unavailability of services for hours, affecting well-known websites like Netflix, Pinterest, Instagram, New York Times, Foursquare, Propublica, Reddit, Quora, and Hootsuite. However, in both cases, Amazon worked to restore service to impacted customers and aimed to share more details about the events in the coming days [5256, 12493]. |
Behaviour |
crash, omission, other |
(a) crash:
- Article 5256 reports a crash incident where Amazon's cloud services crashed, taking down more than 70 sites, including popular ones like the New York Times, Foursquare, and Reddit. The incident caused a networking glitch that led to a cascade of problems, resulting in a system crash [5256].
(b) omission:
- Article 12493 mentions that on Friday night, lightning in Virginia took out part of Amazon's cloud computing service, affecting well-known sites like Netflix, Pinterest, and Instagram. These sites were not accessible for hours, indicating an omission in performing their intended functions [12493].
(c) timing:
- There is no specific mention of a timing-related failure in the provided articles.
(d) value:
- There is no specific mention of a value-related failure in the provided articles.
(e) byzantine:
- There is no specific mention of a byzantine-related failure in the provided articles.
(f) other:
- The other behavior observed in the incidents described in the articles could be categorized as a system failure due to external factors such as a lightning storm causing power failure at the Amazon Web Services center in Northern Virginia. This external factor led to a disruption in service, impacting various websites and services relying on Amazon's cloud infrastructure [12493]. |