| Recurring |
unknown |
The articles do not provide information about a software failure incident happening again at the same organization or at multiple organizations. Therefore, the answer to the question is 'unknown'. |
| Phase (Design/Operation) |
design, operation |
(a) The software failure incident related to the design phase can be seen in the development of software by the NSA to remotely access iPhones and gather various types of data. The NSA produced software, such as DROPOUTJEEP, described as a 'software implant' that allowed infiltrators to push and pull data from iPhones [23507]. This indicates a failure in the design phase where the software was created to enable unauthorized access to iPhones.
(b) The software failure incident related to the operation phase can be observed in the misuse of the software by the NSA to spy on iPhones. The NSA actively worked on software that enabled it to remotely access iPhones and gather data like text messages, photographs, contacts, location, voice mail, and video [23507]. This misuse of the software for spying purposes demonstrates a failure in the operation phase where the software was used inappropriately. |
| Boundary (Internal/External) |
within_system |
(a) within_system: The software failure incident reported in the articles is related to the development of software by the National Security Agency (NSA) that enabled spying on iPhones. The NSA produced software, such as DROPOUTJEEP, described as a 'software implant' that allowed infiltrators to access iPhones remotely and retrieve various data from them [23507]. This software implant was essentially a trojan or malware that helped hackers gain access to protected systems. The software failure incident, in this case, originated from within the system, specifically from the NSA's development of spyware to target iPhones. |
| Nature (Human/Non-human) |
non-human_actions, human_actions |
(a) The software failure incident related to non-human actions is the development of software by the NSA that enabled spying on iPhones, as reported by Der Spiegel [23507]. The NSA produced software like DROPOUTJEEP, described as a 'software implant' that allowed remote access to iPhones for spying purposes. This software implant was designed to push and pull data from iPhones, including text messages, photographs, contacts, location, voicemail, and video, without human intervention.
(b) The software failure incident related to human actions involves the allegations and denials of collusion between Apple and the NSA in creating a backdoor spying program for iPhones [23507]. Apple strenuously denied any involvement in deliberately weakening its products for the NSA's spying efforts. The controversy arose from reports suggesting that the NSA actively worked on software to remotely access iPhones for monitoring purposes, leading to concerns about potential vulnerabilities introduced by human actions. |
| Dimension (Hardware/Software) |
software |
(a) The articles do not provide information about a software failure incident occurring due to contributing factors originating in hardware.
(b) The software failure incident reported in the articles is related to software. The National Security Agency (NSA) developed software, such as DROPOUTJEEP, described as a 'software implant' that allowed infiltrators to remotely access iPhones and retrieve data from them [23507]. The software enabled the NSA to spy on iPhones, including accessing text messages, photographs, contacts, location, voicemail, and video. Additionally, the software could turn iPhones into eavesdropping devices, indicating a failure in the software's security measures. Apple denied any collaboration with the NSA to weaken its products and emphasized its commitment to defending customers from security attacks [23507]. |
| Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) |
malicious |
(a) The objective of the software failure incident was malicious, as it involved the National Security Agency (NSA) developing software to remotely access iPhones and spy on users' text messages, photographs, contacts, location, voicemail, and video. The NSA's program, known as DROPOUTJEEP, was described as a 'trojan' or malware that allowed infiltrators to retrieve data from iPhones [23507].
Additionally, journalist and security expert Jacob Appelbaum revealed how the NSA had the technology to turn iPhones into eavesdropping tools, showcasing the agency's capabilities to plant malicious software on Apple devices for spying purposes [23507]. The NSA's elite team of hackers, known as Tailored Access Operations (TAO), developed tools to penetrate network equipment, monitor mobile phones, and modify data, indicating a deliberate effort to compromise the security and privacy of targeted devices [23507]. |
| Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) |
poor_decisions |
(a) The intent of the software failure incident:
- The software failure incident reported in the articles is related to poor_decisions. This is evident from the allegations and revelations that the National Security Agency (NSA) developed software, such as DROPOUTJEEP, to remotely access iPhones and spy on users' data without their consent [23507].
- Apple denied any collusion with the NSA in creating backdoors or weakening its products intentionally, emphasizing its commitment to defending customers from security attacks regardless of the source [23507]. |
| Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) |
development_incompetence, unknown |
(a) The software failure incident related to development incompetence is evident in the article. The National Security Agency (NSA) developed software, such as DROPOUTJEEP, described as a 'software implant' that allowed infiltrators to access iPhones and retrieve data [23507]. This development of software by the NSA to remotely access iPhones and gather various types of data indicates a lack of professional competence in terms of ethical software development practices.
(b) The software failure incident related to accidental factors is not explicitly mentioned in the provided articles. |
| Duration |
permanent |
(a) The software failure incident described in the articles appears to be permanent. The incident involves the NSA developing software, such as DROPOUTJEEP, to remotely access iPhones and monitor various data on the devices [23507]. This software implant or trojan was designed to allow infiltrators to push and pull data from iPhones, indicating a deliberate weakening of the products for spying purposes. The NSA's capabilities to turn iPhones into eavesdropping tools and the existence of backdoors in iOS devices suggest a long-term and ongoing software vulnerability that could compromise user privacy and security. The incident is not described as a one-time or temporary issue but rather as a systematic effort by the NSA to exploit software weaknesses for surveillance purposes. |
| Behaviour |
value, other |
(a) crash: The articles do not mention any specific instance of a crash where the system loses state and does not perform its intended functions.
(b) omission: The articles do not provide information about the system omitting to perform its intended functions at an instance(s).
(c) timing: The articles do not mention any failure due to the system performing its intended functions correctly but too late or too early.
(d) value: The software failure incident described in the articles is related to the system performing its intended functions incorrectly. The National Security Agency (NSA) developed software, such as DROPOUTJEEP, to remotely access iPhones and extract various data from them, including text messages, photographs, contacts, location, voicemail, and video [23507].
(e) byzantine: The articles do not describe the system behaving erroneously with inconsistent responses and interactions.
(f) other: The software failure incident described in the articles involves the system being targeted by the NSA for the development of software implants like DROPOUTJEEP, which allowed infiltrators to access and retrieve data from iPhones. This behavior can be categorized as a security breach or unauthorized access to user data [23507]. |