| Recurring |
one_organization |
(a) The software failure incident related to Malaysia Airlines' Boeing 777 happened again within the same organization. In August 2005, a Malaysia Airlines 777 flying from Perth, Australia, to Kuala Lumpur experienced a software failure where the plane's software incorrectly measured speed and acceleration, causing the aircraft to suddenly shoot up 3,000 feet. The pilot had to disengage the autopilot and safely land back in Perth. A software update was promptly implemented on planes worldwide to address the issue [25518].
(b) There is no specific information in the provided articles about a similar software failure incident happening at other organizations or with their products and services. |
| Phase (Design/Operation) |
design |
(a) The software failure incident related to the design phase can be seen in the article. In August 2005, a Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 flying from Perth, Australia, to Kuala Lumpur experienced a software failure. The incident was caused by the plane's software incorrectly measuring speed and acceleration, leading to the aircraft suddenly shooting up 3,000 feet while flying at 38,000 feet above the Indian Ocean. The pilot had to disengage the autopilot and descend to land safely back in Perth. A software update was promptly implemented on planes worldwide to address this issue [25518].
(b) The software failure incident related to the operation phase is not explicitly mentioned in the provided article. |
| Boundary (Internal/External) |
within_system |
(a) within_system: The software failure incident mentioned in the articles is related to a Boeing 777 operated by Malaysia Airlines. In August 2005, a 777 flying from Perth to Kuala Lumpur experienced a software failure where the plane's software incorrectly measured speed and acceleration, causing the aircraft to suddenly shoot up 3,000 feet. The pilot had to disengage the autopilot and safely land back in Perth. A software update was promptly made on planes worldwide to address this issue [25518]. This incident falls under the category of within_system failure as it was caused by a software error originating from within the aircraft's system. |
| Nature (Human/Non-human) |
non-human_actions |
(a) The software failure incident occurring due to non-human actions:
- The article mentions a software failure incident in August 2005 involving a Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 flying from Perth to Kuala Lumpur. The incident was caused by the plane's software incorrectly measuring speed and acceleration, leading to the aircraft suddenly shooting up 3,000 feet. This incident was attributed to a non-human factor, specifically a software error [25518].
(b) The software failure incident occurring due to human actions:
- The articles do not provide specific information about a software failure incident caused by human actions. |
| Dimension (Hardware/Software) |
hardware |
(a) The software failure incident related to hardware:
- The article mentions an incident in August 2005 involving a Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 flying from Perth to Kuala Lumpur. The plane's software incorrectly measured speed and acceleration, causing the aircraft to suddenly shoot up 3,000 feet. The pilot had to disengage the autopilot and descend to land safely back in Perth. A software update was quickly implemented on planes worldwide [Article 25518].
(b) The software failure incident related to software:
- The article does not provide specific details about a software failure incident originating directly from software issues. |
| Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) |
non-malicious |
(a) The articles do not provide any information indicating a malicious software failure incident related to the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370. [25518]
(b) The software failure incident related to the Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 disappearance in 2014 was non-malicious. The incident involved the transponder on the plane stopping working around 1.20 am without a change in altitude or course, leading to a sudden event causing the plane to crash. The failure was not attributed to any malicious intent but rather to a technical issue with the transponder. Additionally, there was a previous non-malicious software failure incident involving a Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 in August 2005, where the plane's software incorrectly measured speed and acceleration, causing the aircraft to suddenly shoot up 3,000 feet. This incident was resolved through a software update. [25518] |
| Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) |
unknown |
The articles do not provide specific information about a software failure incident related to poor decisions or accidental decisions. Therefore, the intent of the software failure incident in this case is unknown. |
| Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) |
accidental |
(a) The software failure incident related to development incompetence is not explicitly mentioned in the provided article [25518].
(b) The software failure incident related to accidental factors is mentioned in the article. In August 2005, a Malaysia Airlines Boeing 777 flying from Perth, Australia, to Kuala Lumpur experienced a software failure incident. The incident occurred when the plane's software incorrectly measured speed and acceleration, causing the aircraft to suddenly shoot up 3,000 feet while flying at 38,000 feet above the Indian Ocean. The pilot had to disengage the autopilot and descend to land safely back in Perth. A software update was promptly implemented on planes worldwide to address the issue [25518]. |
| Duration |
temporary |
The software failure incident related to the Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 does not directly indicate whether the duration of the failure was permanent or temporary. The incident mentioned in the article is about the transponder on the plane stopping working at around 1.20 am without a change in altitude or course, leading to the disappearance of the aircraft. This incident does not provide clear information on whether the failure was permanent or temporary [25518]. |
| Behaviour |
crash |
(a) crash: The article mentions a software failure incident related to a crash where the plane's software incorrectly measured speed and acceleration, causing the plane to suddenly shoot up 3,000 feet while flying over the Indian Ocean. The pilot had to disengage the autopilot to regain control of the aircraft, and a software update was quickly made on planes worldwide to address the issue [Article 25518].
(b) omission: The article does not specifically mention a software failure incident related to omission.
(c) timing: The article does not specifically mention a software failure incident related to timing.
(d) value: The article does not specifically mention a software failure incident related to the system performing its intended functions incorrectly.
(e) byzantine: The article does not specifically mention a software failure incident related to the system behaving erroneously with inconsistent responses and interactions.
(f) other: The article does not provide information on any other specific behavior of the software failure incident. |