| Recurring |
multiple_organization |
(a) The software failure incident related to the air bag system in Land Rover vehicles is not explicitly mentioned to have happened again within the same organization in the provided article [28933].
(b) The article mentions that federal auto safety regulators have intensified their focus on air-bag problems after General Motors' safety crisis involving defective ignition switches that could disable air bags [28933]. Additionally, the article reports that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration opened an inquiry into the potential failure of passenger air bags in Chevrolet Impala sedans, tied to the same kind of electronic air-bag system at issue in the Land Rover recalls [28933]. This indicates that similar incidents related to air bag systems have occurred in vehicles from multiple organizations. |
| Phase (Design/Operation) |
design |
(a) The software failure incident related to the design phase is evident in the Land Rover recall mentioned in Article 28933. The article states that the issue with the passenger-side air bag not deploying correctly was due to a problem in the electronic system that determines whether someone is sitting in the passenger seat. This indicates a failure introduced during the system development or updates, leading to the incorrect signals being sent to shut down the air bag, even if an adult is in the seat.
(b) The software failure incident related to the operation phase is not explicitly mentioned in the article. |
| Boundary (Internal/External) |
within_system |
(a) The software failure incident related to the Land Rover air bag recall is within_system. The issue was identified as a problem with the system's memory causing faulty computer signals, leading to the passenger air bag being disabled [28933]. |
| Nature (Human/Non-human) |
non-human_actions, human_actions |
(a) The software failure incident related to non-human actions in the Land Rover recall was due to a problem with the system's memory causing faulty computer signals, which resulted in the passenger-side airbag potentially failing to deploy in a crash [28933].
(b) The software failure incident related to human actions in the Chevrolet Impala inquiry was prompted by a defect petition filed by an engineer, Donald Friedman, who investigated a crash where the passenger-side airbag did not deploy despite the passenger's weight being 170 pounds [28933]. |
| Dimension (Hardware/Software) |
hardware, software |
(a) The software failure incident related to hardware: The article mentions that in the Land Rover recall, the problem with the system's memory is suspected of causing the faulty computer signals, indicating a hardware-related issue [28933].
(b) The software failure incident related to software: The article highlights that the Land Rover recall is due to a problem in the electronic system that determines whether someone is sitting in the passenger seat. The issue is with the software algorithm that controls the passenger-side airbag, indicating a software-related problem [28933]. |
| Objective (Malicious/Non-malicious) |
non-malicious |
(a) The software failure incident related to the Land Rover recall for the passenger-side air bag issue is categorized as non-malicious. The failure was attributed to a problem in the electronic system that determines whether someone is sitting in the passenger seat, leading to the air bag being disabled erroneously, even if an adult is present. The solution proposed by Jaguar Land Rover was to update the software to prevent such issues [28933]. |
| Intent (Poor/Accidental Decisions) |
unknown |
The software failure incident related to the Land Rover air bag recall does not directly point to poor decisions or accidental decisions as the intent behind the failure. The issue with the air bag deployment was attributed to a problem in the electronic system that determines whether someone is sitting in the passenger seat, specifically related to the system's memory causing faulty computer signals [28933]. This indicates a technical fault rather than poor or accidental decisions being the primary cause of the failure. |
| Capability (Incompetence/Accidental) |
development_incompetence, accidental |
(a) The software failure incident related to development incompetence is evident in the article as it mentions a problem with the system's memory suspected of causing faulty computer signals in the Land Rover recalls [28933]. This indicates a potential issue with the software development process or implementation that led to the failure of the electronic system determining whether the passenger-side airbag should deploy.
(b) The software failure incident related to accidental factors is highlighted in the article when it mentions that in the case of the Chevrolet Impala sedans, the problem being investigated is whether the software algorithm controlling the passenger-side airbag is faulty [28933]. This suggests that the failure may have occurred unintentionally due to a flaw or mistake in the software algorithm. |
| Duration |
temporary |
The software failure incident related to the air bag issue in Land Rover vehicles can be categorized as a temporary failure. The article mentions that the problem with the electronic system that determines whether someone is sitting in the passenger seat could cause signals to be mistakenly sent to shut down the passenger air bag, even if an adult is in the seat. Updating the software is mentioned as a solution to prevent this problem, indicating that the failure is not permanent but can be rectified by a software update [28933]. |
| Behaviour |
crash, omission, value |
(a) crash: The software failure incident related to the Land Rover recall was due to a problem with the system's memory causing faulty computer signals, which could result in the passenger airbag being totally or partly disabled in a crash [28933].
(b) omission: The software failure incident involved the system mistakenly sending signals to shut down the passenger airbag, even if an adult is in the seat, leading to the omission of the airbag deployment when needed [28933].
(d) value: The failure was due to the system performing its intended functions incorrectly, as the electronic system that determines whether someone is sitting in the passenger seat was not functioning properly, leading to the disabling of the front-seat passenger’s airbag [28933]. |